Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
MacMillan, Donald L. | 2 |
Balow, Irving H. | 1 |
Bersoff, Donald N. | 1 |
Condas, Joanne | 1 |
Cornejo Guevara, Maria V. | 1 |
Dent, H. | 1 |
Dent, Harold E. | 1 |
Dizon, Francis Gary | 1 |
Frisby, Craig L. | 1 |
Gamble, Brandon | 1 |
Garcia, Ernest | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Policymakers | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
California | 20 |
Florida | 1 |
New York (New York) | 1 |
South Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Larry P v Riles | 14 |
Debra P v Turlington | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Powers, Kristin; Hill, Brianna; Cornejo Guevara, Maria V. – Contemporary School Psychology, 2021
Forty years have passed since the "Larry P. v. Riles" (1979) decision prohibiting the use of standardized intelligence quotient (IQ) tests to assess African American children in California for special education. While the "Larry P." case has governed the assessment practices of school psychologists for so many years, yet little…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Special Education, Civil Rights, African American Students
Taroucha T. Williams – ProQuest LLC, 2023
A court decision in California, Larry P. v. Riles (1979) case, ruled in favor of African American students who were disproportionately and wrongly placed in special education (E.M.R. -- educable mentally retarded) classes. Standardized intelligence tests were biased, discriminatory and failed to identify the academic need to support African…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Educational Legislation, African American Students, Disproportionate Representation
Commentary of the Special Issue Regarding Black Children: A California School Psychology Perspective
Gamble, Brandon; Hiramoto, James – Contemporary School Psychology, 2021
As editors for this special journal, Graves and Woods have compiled a discussion of the accuracy of the labels for Black children. It is exciting that they have brought together a team of scholars to tackle the very specific question posed by Hilliard (1991) and Guthrie (1976/2002) about the validity of IQ testing in regards to accurately and…
Descriptors: School Psychology, African American Students, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Garcia, Ernest – Multicultural Education, 2015
Other than being African American, little is known of Larry, the lead plaintiff in the legal case known as "Larry P. v. Riles" in 1971, which banned the use of standardized intelligence testing on African-American students in the State of California. As a result of such intelligence testing, Larry was diagnosed as being mildly mentally…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Intelligence Tests, African American Students, Clinical Diagnosis
Frisby, Craig L.; Henry, Betty – Contemporary School Psychology, 2016
A little over 35 years have passed since the original "Larry P." decision was handed down in 1979 by Robert Peckham, a federal judge for the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The "Larry P. case" is a shorthand moniker that refers to a class action lawsuit, supported by the Bay Area Association of Black…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, African American Students, Intellectual Disability, Disproportionate Representation
Dizon, Francis Gary – ProQuest LLC, 2013
The 1979 landmark case of "Larry P. v. Riles" continues to be one of the most debated topics in school psychology. In this case, Judge Peckham ruled that standardized, norm-referenced intelligence tests were culturally biased towards African-Americans, resulting in overrepresentation of African-Americans in Educably Mentally Retarded…
Descriptors: School Psychologists, Court Litigation, Intelligence Tests, Standardized Tests

Holden, Constance – Science, 1978
Discussed is the 1977-78 trial involving the California state superintendent of public instruction and a Black child, allegedly misplaced in EMR classes on the basis of IQ tests. (JLH)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students, Intelligence

Integrated Education, 1973
An analysis by the Media program staff members of the Human Rights Commission of San Francisco of the circumstances under which group intelligence testing has been ended in the San Francisco Unified School District as of March 1973, and of related issues concerning educational diagnosis. (JM)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Educational Diagnosis, Educational Policy, Federal Courts

Dent, Harold E. – Negro Educational Review, 1987
A court order banned the use of standardized I.Q. tests in California because they disproportionately assigned Black and other minority children to special education programs. Nonbiased assessments of cognitive behavior were implemented. They emphasize processes rather than products of learning. The number of minorities in special education has…
Descriptors: Black Youth, Court Litigation, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education

Dent, H.; And Others – Negro Educational Review, 1987
The use of standardized I.Q. tests for Blacks has been banned in California State schools. This court settlement culminated 15 years of legal action on a class action suit filed by Black parents for their children who had been disproportionately assigned to classes for the mentally retarded. (VM)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Black Students, Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education
MacMillan, Donald L.; Balow, Irving H. – Diagnostique, 1991
This paper examines the impact of the court decision in Larry P. versus Riles, which declared that intelligence tests are biased and banned the overrepresentation of African-American children in educable mentally retarded programs. The paper discusses the educational situation of these children, now served in regular programs, and examines…
Descriptors: Black Students, Court Litigation, Educational Practices, Elementary Secondary Education

Condas, Joanne – School Psychology Review, 1980
This article questions the appropriateness of having self appointed specialists (the plaintiffs dictate to others (the school system) how to conduct their responsibilities, particularly with respect to providing children with the option of choosing to enroll in special educable mentally retarded programs. (CTM)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Alternative Assessment, Black Students, Court Litigation
Haney, Walt; Radin, Eugene – 1979
Remarks made at the conference are summarized in seven sections of this narrative report: (1) update: recent events concerning testing,--representing the viewpoints of school districts, professional associations, government agencies, and research organizations; (2) National Institute of Education (NIE) study of school districts' use of test and…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Court Litigation, Curriculum, Educational Legislation

Bersoff, Donald N. – School Psychology Review, 1980
This article presents the background, the history, and the implications of the Larry P. v Riles decisions in 1972 and in 1979 in which a federal district court enjoined California from using any standardized intelligence tests to assess Black children for eligibility for classes of educable mentally retarded. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Ability Grouping, Ability Identification, Black Students, Court Litigation
California State Dept. of Education, Sacramento. Div. of Special Education. – 1989
The report summarizes findings and recommendations of a California Task Force which arose out of a California court decision (Larry P. versus Riles) which prohibits the use of intelligence tests for assessing black pupils to determine their placement in special education programs and requires alternative means of assessment. Seven major…
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, Black Students, Court Litigation, Disabilities
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1 | 2