Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Children | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Error Correction | 1 |
| Experimental Psychology | 1 |
| Expertise | 1 |
| Familiarity | 1 |
| Information Technology | 1 |
| Memory | 1 |
| Psychology | 1 |
| Rating Scales | 1 |
| Recognition (Psychology) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMickes, Laura; Hwe, Vivian; Wais, Peter E.; Wixted, John T. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2011
People are generally skilled at using a confidence scale to rate the strength of their memories over a wide range. Specifically, low-confidence recognition decisions are often associated with close-to-chance accuracy, whereas high-confidence recognition decisions can be associated with close-to-perfect accuracy. However, using a 20-point rating…
Descriptors: Expertise, Familiarity, Rating Scales, Children
