ERIC Number: ED661132
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2024
Pages: 8
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
Using the McNamara Fallacy to Critique (Mis)Representations of "Success" in Mathematics Education
Rebecca Burtenshaw; Merrilyn Goos
Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA) (46th, Gold Coast, Australia, Jun 30-Jul 4, 2024)
This position paper examines the phenomenon of the McNamara Fallacy to analyse flawed conceptions of "success" in mathematics learning, normalised assessment structures and their implications for mathematics education. The established presence of the McNamara Fallacy and the ramifications of this statistical fallacy provide a foundation to demonstrate its existence and parallels within mathematics education, including NAPLAN and other common assessment structures. Viewing such assessments through the lens of the McNamara Fallacy allows educators to recognise, explain, and potentially address their negative consequences.
Descriptors: Criticism, Misconceptions, Mathematics Education, Success, Learning Processes, Mathematics Tests, Mathematics Achievement, Mathematics Teachers, Foreign Countries, National Competency Tests, Literacy, Numeracy, War, Statistical Analysis, Mathematical Logic, Educational Trends, Trend Analysis
Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. GPO Box 2747, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia. Tel: +61-8-8363-0288; Fax: +61-8-8362-9288; e-mail: sales@merga.net.au; Web site: http://www.merga.net.au/
Publication Type: Reports - Evaluative; Speeches/Meeting Papers
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA)
Identifiers - Location: Australia
Identifiers - Assessments and Surveys: National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A