Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Gender Bias | 2 |
| Grants | 2 |
| Academic Rank (Professional) | 1 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| COVID-19 | 1 |
| Child Rearing | 1 |
| Citations (References) | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Conferences (Gatherings) | 1 |
| Cultural Influences | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textAllen, Kelly-Ann; Butler-Henderson, Kerryn; Reupert, Andrea; Longmuir, Fiona; Finefter-Rosenbluh, Ilana; Berger, Emily; Grove, Christine; Heffernan, Amanda; Freeman, Nerelie; Kewalramani, Sarika; Krebs, Shiri; Dsouza, Levita; Mackie, Grace; Chapman, Denise; Fleer, Marilyn – Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2021
Historically, the professional structure of higher education has provided restricted employment, career, and leadership opportunities for women. This is exacerbated where there is an intersection between gender and race, culture, religion, or age. Women continue to be underrepresented in senior leadership positions across a range of disciplines,…
Descriptors: Gender Bias, Women Faculty, College Faculty, Barriers
Direct linkMarsh, Herbert W.; Jayasinghe, Upali W.; Bond, Nigel W. – American Psychologist, 2008
Peer review is a gatekeeper, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but it has been criticized in relation to traditional psychological research criteria of reliability, validity, generalizability, and potential biases. Despite a considerable literature, there is surprisingly little sound peer-review research examining these criteria or…
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), Psychological Studies, Validity, Social Sciences
