Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Academic Standards | 1 |
| Achievement Rating | 1 |
| Doctoral Dissertations | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| Examiners | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| Interrater Reliability | 1 |
| Meta Analysis | 1 |
| Student Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Australian Journal of… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHolbrook, Allyson; Bourke, Sid; Lovat, Terry; Fairbairn, Hedy – Australian Journal of Education, 2008
This is a mixed methods investigation of consistency in PhD examination. At its core is the quantification of the content and conceptual analysis of examiner reports for 804 Australian theses. First, the level of consistency between what examiners say in their reports and the recommendation they provide for a thesis is explored, followed by an…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Examiners, Student Evaluation, Foreign Countries
