NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Teachers1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 46 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Awdry, Rebecca; Dawson, Phillip; Sutherland-Smith, Wendy – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
Increasing pressure is being placed on governments and legislators in different countries to take action against assignment outsourcing in higher education. Global discussions focus on prohibiting commercial outsourcing providers, such as contract cheating services. Despite evidence to suggest that outsourcing behaviours by students are…
Descriptors: Cheating, Educational Legislation, Prevention, Assignments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yorke, Jonathan; Sefcik, Lesley; Veeran-Colton, Terisha – Studies in Higher Education, 2022
This study examines the emergent issue of blackmail and contract cheating through a scenario-based online exercise completed by 587 university students in Western Australia. Participants were presented with two consecutive scenarios, each involving a difficult assignment. The possibility of blackmail was introduced prior to (and within) the second…
Descriptors: Cheating, Contracts, Integrity, Risk
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Curtis, Guy J.; McNeill, Margot; Slade, Christine; Tremayne, Kell; Harper, Rowena; Rundle, Kiata; Greenaway, Ruth – Studies in Higher Education, 2022
The highest estimates of the prevalence of commercial contract cheating in Australia come from self-report surveys, which suggest that around 2% of students engage in commercial contract cheating during their higher education studies. However, self-report surveys are limited in that participants under-report socially-undesirable behaviours. In…
Descriptors: Measurement Techniques, Incidence, Cheating, Contracts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jiahui Luo – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
This study offers a critical examination of university policies developed to address recent challenges presented by generative AI (GenAI) to higher education assessment. Drawing on Bacchi's 'What's the problem represented to be' (WPR) framework, we analysed the GenAI policies of 20 world-leading universities to explore what are considered problems…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Educational Policy, College Students, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Awdry, R.; Ives, B. – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2023
Prevalence of contract cheating and outsourcing through organised methods has received interest in research studies aiming to determine the most suitable strategies to reduce the problem. Few studies have presented an international approach or tested which variables could be correlated with contract cheating. As a result, strategies to reduce…
Descriptors: Cheating, Higher Education, Contracts, Outsourcing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Henderson, Michael; Chung, Jennifer; Awdry, Rebecca; Mundy, Matthew; Bryant, Mike; Ashford, Cliff; Ryan, Kris – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
Online examinations are a common experience in higher education. Their security is a key concern for education communities, and has resulted in a variety of cheating countermeasures. There is broad consensus in the literature that there is no one measure, including proctoring, which eradicates cheating behaviours. As a result, this study is…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Cheating, College Students, Student Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kelli Nicola-Richmond; Phillip Dawson; Helen Partridge – Higher Education Research and Development, 2024
Remote proctoring of exams is one of the most divisive issues in higher education. Critiques of remote proctoring abound, and there are a variety of perspectives particularly in relation to the advantages and disadvantages of this type of assessment, and opportunities for cheating. However, these perspectives are largely based on rhetoric with…
Descriptors: Supervision, Student Evaluation, Computer Assisted Testing, Distance Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harper, Rowena; Bretag, Tracey; Rundle, Kiata – Higher Education Research and Development, 2021
This article contributes to an emerging body of research on the role of assessment design in the prevention and detection of contract cheating. Drawing on the largest contract cheating dataset gathered to date (see cheatingandassessment.edu.au), this article examines the types of assignments and exams in which students self-reported having engaged…
Descriptors: Cheating, Identification, College Students, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sefcik, Lesley; Veeran-Colton, Terisha; Baird, Michael; Price, Connie; Steyn, Steve – Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2022
This study aimed to understand the effects of a custom-developed, artificial intelligence-based, asynchronous remote invigilation system on the student user experience. The study was conducted over 3 years at a large Australian university, and findings demonstrate that familiarity with the system over time improved student attitudes towards remote…
Descriptors: Usability, Users (Information), Student Attitudes, Supervision
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Awdry, Rebecca; Ives, Bob – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2021
Research on contract cheating usually considers most forms of outsourcing combined, although studies have found that students more commonly obtain work from those known to them, rather than from commercial sites; yet little research exists which explores which variables and motivators may be associated with this type of outsourcing. Strategies…
Descriptors: Cheating, Student Behavior, Outsourcing, Predictor Variables
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rowena Harper; Felicity Prentice – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2024
This paper addresses the marked absence of student voices in contemporary research on academic integrity, and in doing so challenges a number of persistent ideas about cheating in higher education. We report the qualitative findings from a large-scale survey of Australian university students (n = 14,086), in which 4,915 students responded to one…
Descriptors: College Students, Integrity, Cheating, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hancock, Phil; Birt, Jac; De Lange, Paul; Fowler, Carolyn; Kavanagh, Marie; Mitrione, Lorena; Rankin, Michaela; Slaughter, Geoff; Williams, Andrew – Accounting Education, 2023
A key role of universities is the credentialing of student learning by awarding degrees and diplomas. This requires universities to have confidence in the integrity of their assessment processes and in turn, external stakeholders to have the same confidence. This study investigates the following research question: 'Has COVID-19 had an impact on…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Student Evaluation, Accounting, Business Administration Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clisby, Nathan; Edwards, Antony – International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2022
In this classroom note, we outline a system of assessment used by the authors since 2020 to deliver individualized summative assessments to students from first- and second-year mathematics courses. Our system comprises three modular components allowing a mix-and-match of different technological approaches and mathematical question types. First is…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Summative Evaluation, College Students, College Mathematics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bretag, Tracey; Harper, Rowena; Rundle, Kiata; Newton, Philip M.; Ellis, Cath; Saddiqui, Sonia; van Haeringen, Karen – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2020
This article reports on one aspect of a nationally funded research project on contract cheating in Australian higher education. The project explored students' and educators' experiences of contract cheating, and the contextual factors that may influence it. This article reports the key findings from non-university higher education providers…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Cheating, Universities, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Malcolm Tight – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
This article presents a literature review of published research focused on challenging cheating in higher education. A brief overview of the literature on cheating in higher education is offered, showing the global interest in the topic, the varied ways in which it has been defined, and evidence on its incidence and causes. The range of methods…
Descriptors: Cheating, Higher Education, Global Approach, Discipline Problems
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4