Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Context Effect | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| Focus Groups | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Institutional Evaluation | 1 |
| Performance Based Assessment | 1 |
| Research Universities | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research Evaluation | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkGlennie, Miriam; O'Donnell, Michael; Brown, Michelle; Benson, John – Research Evaluation, 2019
Evaluators play a central role in assessments of researchers' performance for reward, but the nature of their role and influence is not well understood. Ongoing reliance on evaluator judgement is typically justified as a need for referees in contests for reward, because quantitative performance measures alone can be subject to distortion. Yet, if…
Descriptors: Research Universities, Role, Evaluators, Focus Groups
