NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wolverton, Mimi; Gmelch, Walter H.; Wolverton, Marvin L.; Sarros, James C. – Higher Education, 1999
Compares how academic department chairs at colleges and universities in Australia and the U.S. define their tasks. Major differences noted include the propensity of U.S. chairs to think of soliciting ideas for departmental improvement as a long-term endeavor, whereas Australian chairs perceive of idea solicitation as an administrative task, and…
Descriptors: Change Agents, Comparative Education, Department Heads, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Moses, Ingrid – Higher Education, 1985
The role and functions of university department heads as analyzed in the literature are outlined and compared with the perceptions and expectations of the staff of eight departments in one Australian university, who attached great importance to the administrator's function of encouragement. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Case Studies, College Faculty, Department Heads
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Imrie, B. W. – Higher Education, 1981
Policies and professionalism are discussed with reference to experiences in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and Great Britain. A professional development policy is considered to be a prerequisite for inservice programs for academic staff, evaluation of academic performance, and career-related decisions. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Governing Councils, College Students, Departments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Newman, W. – Higher Education, 1986
The foreign composition of faculties in schools and departments of education in 10 Australian colleges and universities is examined in terms of the proportions, qualifications, nationalities, and influences of these faculty members on the institutions. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Colleges, Departments, Faculty Recruitment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ramsden, Paul – Higher Education, 1994
A study of research productivity among 890 Australian faculty members in 18 universities during 1985-89 found the overall average to be low but with a wide range of variation. Additional variables examined include level of research activity, subject area, institution type, gender, age, early research interest, and satisfaction with the promotion…
Descriptors: Age Differences, College Administration, College Faculty, Comparative Analysis