NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Teachers1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 82 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Awdry, Rebecca; Dawson, Phillip; Sutherland-Smith, Wendy – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
Increasing pressure is being placed on governments and legislators in different countries to take action against assignment outsourcing in higher education. Global discussions focus on prohibiting commercial outsourcing providers, such as contract cheating services. Despite evidence to suggest that outsourcing behaviours by students are…
Descriptors: Cheating, Educational Legislation, Prevention, Assignments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Monica Gallant; Pranab Kumar Pani – Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 2024
Purpose: The aim of this paper is to explore the behavior pattern, perceptions, and motivations of students towards academic misconduct in a Business School with a view to mitigating its occurrence. Design/methodology/approach: The survey was conducted among a batch of undergraduate students who responded to various dimensions of plagiarism…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Undergraduate Students, Business Administration Education, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Richardson, Steven – International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2022
During the 2020 COVID-19 lockdowns, one of the primary challenges faced by mathematics educators was maintaining assessment integrity when replacing invigilated assessments with online assessments. These assessments presented students with the opportunity to engage in misconduct in a manner that ordinarily would not exist. This was particularly…
Descriptors: Mathematics Tests, Integrity, Cheating, COVID-19
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Awdry, Rebecca – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2021
The extent and reach of commercial cheating opportunities is ever present; thousands of websites promote differing business models offering assignments in multiple languages and currencies. In addition to commercial companies, students are known to outsource their assignments from friends and family. Assignment outsourcing and contract cheating…
Descriptors: Assignments, Outsourcing, Cheating, Contracts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bornsztejn, Hannah – Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2022
Academic integrity lies "at the core of the reputation of Australia's world class higher education sector" (Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA), 2020). This pilot study analyses the dominant approach (punitive or educative) of academic integrity policies by selected institutions within the Australian state of Victoria…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Integrity, Educational Policy, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Curtis, Guy J.; Slade, Christine; Bretag, Tracey; McNeill, Margot – Higher Education Research and Development, 2022
In 2019, the Australian higher education regulator, the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA), commissioned a team of academic integrity experts to design and facilitate a series of national workshops, with the aim of increasing academic integrity knowledge and building a culture of integrity across the higher education sector.…
Descriptors: Program Development, Program Evaluation, Expertise, Integrity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Birks, Melanie; Mills, Jane; Allen, Steph; Tee, Stephen – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2020
Academic misconduct is a problem of growing concern across the tertiary education sector. While plagiarism has been the most common form of academic misconduct, the advent of software programs to detect plagiarism has seen the problem of misconduct simply mutate. As universities attempt to function in an increasingly complex environment, the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Cheating, Plagiarism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rowena Harper; Felicity Prentice – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2024
Teaching staff play a pivotal role in the prevention, detection and management of cheating in higher education. They enact curriculum and assessment design strategies, identify and substantiate suspected cases, and are positioned by many as being on the 'front line' of a battle that threatens to undermine the integrity of higher education. Against…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Teacher Attitudes, Cheating, Prevention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yorke, Jonathan; Sefcik, Lesley; Veeran-Colton, Terisha – Studies in Higher Education, 2022
This study examines the emergent issue of blackmail and contract cheating through a scenario-based online exercise completed by 587 university students in Western Australia. Participants were presented with two consecutive scenarios, each involving a difficult assignment. The possibility of blackmail was introduced prior to (and within) the second…
Descriptors: Cheating, Contracts, Integrity, Risk
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Curtis, Guy J.; McNeill, Margot; Slade, Christine; Tremayne, Kell; Harper, Rowena; Rundle, Kiata; Greenaway, Ruth – Studies in Higher Education, 2022
The highest estimates of the prevalence of commercial contract cheating in Australia come from self-report surveys, which suggest that around 2% of students engage in commercial contract cheating during their higher education studies. However, self-report surveys are limited in that participants under-report socially-undesirable behaviours. In…
Descriptors: Measurement Techniques, Incidence, Cheating, Contracts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jiahui Luo – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
This study offers a critical examination of university policies developed to address recent challenges presented by generative AI (GenAI) to higher education assessment. Drawing on Bacchi's 'What's the problem represented to be' (WPR) framework, we analysed the GenAI policies of 20 world-leading universities to explore what are considered problems…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Educational Policy, College Students, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Parkinson, Ann L.; Hatje, Eva; Kynn, Mary; Kuballa, Anna V.; Donkin, Rebecca; Reinke, Nicole B. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
Academic integrity is important, not just in the university setting but beyond, as students graduate and move into professional fields. Discrepancies in the understanding of what constitutes academic dishonesty exist between institutional policies, discipline areas and individual educators, which creates challenges for students trying to uphold…
Descriptors: Integrity, Cheating, Ethics, Plagiarism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Awdry, R.; Ives, B. – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2023
Prevalence of contract cheating and outsourcing through organised methods has received interest in research studies aiming to determine the most suitable strategies to reduce the problem. Few studies have presented an international approach or tested which variables could be correlated with contract cheating. As a result, strategies to reduce…
Descriptors: Cheating, Higher Education, Contracts, Outsourcing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Henderson, Michael; Chung, Jennifer; Awdry, Rebecca; Mundy, Matthew; Bryant, Mike; Ashford, Cliff; Ryan, Kris – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
Online examinations are a common experience in higher education. Their security is a key concern for education communities, and has resulted in a variety of cheating countermeasures. There is broad consensus in the literature that there is no one measure, including proctoring, which eradicates cheating behaviours. As a result, this study is…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Cheating, College Students, Student Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kelli Nicola-Richmond; Phillip Dawson; Helen Partridge – Higher Education Research and Development, 2024
Remote proctoring of exams is one of the most divisive issues in higher education. Critiques of remote proctoring abound, and there are a variety of perspectives particularly in relation to the advantages and disadvantages of this type of assessment, and opportunities for cheating. However, these perspectives are largely based on rhetoric with…
Descriptors: Supervision, Student Evaluation, Computer Assisted Testing, Distance Education
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6