Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Color | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Experimental Psychology | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Interference (Learning) | 1 |
| Naming | 1 |
| Reaction Time | 1 |
| Responses | 1 |
| Undergraduate Students | 1 |
| Verbal Communication | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Author
| De Wit, Bianca | 1 |
| Kinoshita, Sachiko | 1 |
| Norris, Dennis | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stroop Color Word Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKinoshita, Sachiko; De Wit, Bianca; Norris, Dennis – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2017
In 2 variants of the color-word Stroop task, we compared 5 types of color-neutral distractors--real words (e.g., "HAT"), pseudowords (e.g., "HIX"), consonant strings (e.g., "HDK"), symbol strings (e.g., #$%), and a row of Xs (e.g., "XXX")--as well as incongruent color words (e.g., "GREEN" displayed…
Descriptors: Color, Interference (Learning), Reaction Time, Visual Stimuli
