Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Charter Schools | 1 |
| Educational Change | 1 |
| Educational Indicators | 1 |
| Evaluation | 1 |
| Federal Programs | 1 |
| High Stakes Tests | 1 |
| Incentives | 1 |
| Merit Pay | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Politics of Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Education Commission of the… | 1 |
Author
| Baumann, Paul | 1 |
| Thompson, Barbara | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Arizona | 1 |
| Louisiana | 1 |
| Maryland | 1 |
| New York | 1 |
| North Carolina | 1 |
| Pennsylvania | 1 |
| South Carolina | 1 |
| Tennessee | 1 |
| Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Race to the Top | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full text
Direct linkThompson, Barbara; Baumann, Paul – Education Commission of the States (NJ3), 2011
Whether referred to as "pay-for-performance" (PFP) or "merit pay," attempting to tie educators' compensation to their performance in the classroom and students' performance on high-stakes tests has been a key component of many educator compensation reform efforts in the last five years. This issue looks at PFP systems broadly…
Descriptors: Merit Pay, Charter Schools, High Stakes Tests, Educational Change
