Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 12 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 229 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Vernez, Georges | 7 |
Hoff, David J. | 6 |
Gill, Brian | 5 |
Hess, Frederick M. | 5 |
Chubb, John E. | 4 |
Klein, Alyson | 4 |
Ashby, Nicole, Ed. | 3 |
Doolittle, Martha | 3 |
Eisner, Elizabeth | 3 |
Kober, Nancy | 3 |
Le Floch, Kerstin Carlson | 3 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 216 |
High Schools | 58 |
Grade 4 | 56 |
Grade 8 | 54 |
Higher Education | 12 |
Elementary Education | 11 |
Secondary Education | 10 |
Middle Schools | 6 |
Postsecondary Education | 6 |
Grade 2 | 3 |
Grade 3 | 3 |
More ▼ |
Location
Florida | 18 |
United States | 16 |
Ohio | 13 |
California | 11 |
District of Columbia | 10 |
New York | 10 |
Georgia | 8 |
Wisconsin | 8 |
Colorado | 7 |
Massachusetts | 7 |
Texas | 7 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards | 1 |
US Department of Education, 2004
The Unsafe School Choice Option (USCO) (section 9532 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965, as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001) requires that each State receiving funds under the ESEA establish and implement a statewide policy requiring that students attending a persistently dangerous public elementary or…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education, Public Schools, School Choice
Rentner, Diane Stark; Chudowsky, Naomi; Fagan, Tom; Gayler, Keith; Hamilton, Madlene; Kober, Nancy – 2003
This study examines how the federal government and states prepare to implement the No Child Left Behind Act. Researchers reviewed states' consolidated applications for federal grants; conducted telephone interviews with officials in 48 states, the District of Columbia, and 8 school districts; and reviewed relevant research. The study addresses…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Accountability, Educational Quality, Educational Research
Council for American Private Education, 2004
This document presents the November 2004 issue of the Council for American Private Education's (CAPE's) monthly newsletter, "Outlook." Articles in this issue include: (1) Government Report Shows Increase in Private Schools and Students; (2) CAPE Board Meets with Secretary Paige; (3) Forum Focuses on Market Education; (4) SAT Scores Go…
Descriptors: Private Schools, Enrollment Trends, College Entrance Examinations, Elementary Secondary Education
Grobe, William J.; Buckner, Kermit G. – Journal of School Public Relations, 2005
The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation of 2001 has brought great public and professional pressure upon U.S. public schools. Perhaps trying to explain its requirements and possible consequences is the most daunting task for school leaders. This article provides an overview of its legal context followed by thoughts about effective public…
Descriptors: Public Schools, Federal Legislation, Public Relations, Educational Legislation
Bracey, Gerald W. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
This brief examines how No Child Left Behind (NCLB) dollars flow from the federal government through states and districts and into the coffers of companies, mostly for-profit companies. The brief makes the case that the law enriches many private companies and individuals, especially those close to President George W. Bush and his family. The brief…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation, Educational Finance, Costs
National Association of State Boards of Education, Alexandria, VA. – 2002
The 2002 reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, known as No Child Left Behind, significantly expands the role of the federal government in elementary and secondary education and has important implications for rural and small schools. This guide examines 15 areas of the legislation that will have the greatest impact on rural…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Accountability, Educational Assessment, Educational Policy
Lewis, Joy W. – 2003
This brief discusses how school districts nationwide are dealing with the challenges of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). To understand how districts are reacting to NCLB, the researchers interviewed staff, visited websites, and examined other documentation from districts across the country and from national and regional education…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Educational Finance, Educational Improvement
Le Floch, Kerstin Carlson; Martinez, Felipe; O'Day, Jennifer; Stecher, Brian; Taylor, James; Cook, Andrea – US Department of Education, 2007
This report presents findings about accountability from two longitudinal studies, the National Longitudinal Study of "No Child Left Behind" (NLS-"NCLB"), and the Study of State Implementation of Accountability and Teacher Quality Under "No Child Left Behind" (SSI-"NCLB"). The research teams for these two…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Academic Achievement
US Department of Education, 2005
This publication aims to briefly describe the important features and general characteristics of education in the United States. It is important to note that, due to the highly decentralized nature of U.S. education, policies and practices can vary considerably from state to state and from school district to school district. This publication cites…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, School Districts, Educational Administration, Educational Policy
Howell, William G. – Education Next, 2004
In this article, the author takes an inside look at efforts in Worcester, Massachusetts to offer families the opportunities promised by the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). Worcester is the third largest school system in the state of Massachusetts, serving roughly 25,000 students in 46 public schools (36 elementary, 4 middle, 5 high, and one…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Federal Government, Educational Finance, Educational Legislation
Edison Project, New York, NY. – 2003
This report provides a consolidated public record of the performance of Edison-run schools. Edison agrees to provide annually to each local partner comprehensive information about the operation and outcomes of its local partnership schools. Edison is also required by charter-school laws to report on its partnership schools. This report includes…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Gains, Change Agents, Charter Schools
National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2007
This report expands and updates the information provided in the "National Assessment of Title I Interim Report" that was released in April 2006. New data on the implementation of Title I are provided on the targeting and uses of Title I funds, services for private school students, characteristics of students participating in the school…
Descriptors: Racial Differences, Poverty, Minority Groups, Remedial Instruction
Stullich, Stephanie; Eisner, Elizabeth; McCrary, Joseph – National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2007
This two-volume report, and Summary of Key Findings, presents findings from the congressionally mandated National Assessment of Title I on the implementation and impact of the program. Volume I contains key findings on the implementation of the program under No Child Left Behind, and Volume II [see ED499018] presents a report on follow-up findings…
Descriptors: Private Schools, Teacher Effectiveness, Mathematics Instruction, Federal Legislation
Amos, Jason, Ed. – Alliance for Excellent Education, 2004
"Straight A's: Public Education Policy and Progress" is a biweekly newsletter that focuses on education news and events both in Washington, DC and around the country. The following articles are included in this issue: (1) "Profiles in Leadership": Alliance Releases a Collection of Essays from America's Foremost Education…
Descriptors: Rural Schools, Graduation Rate, Federal Legislation, Educational Finance
Office for Civil Rights (ED), Washington, DC. – 2003
This report to Congress covers the actions and accomplishments of the Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (OCR) for the period beginning October 1, 2000, and ending September 30, 2002. The first section, titled "Overview of OCR Compliance and Enforcement Program," looks at the Office's organizational structure, complaint…
Descriptors: Access to Education, Accountability, Civil Rights, Civil Rights Legislation