ERIC - Search Results

Descriptor

Academically Gifted	2
Federal Legislation	2
Academic Achievement	1
Advanced Students	1
Educational Improvement	1
Educational Legislation	1
Educational Quality	1
Elementary Secondary Education	1
Evaluation Methods	1
Student Evaluation	1
Teacher Education	1
Testing Programs	1
More ▼

Source

Roeper Review

Author

Gallagher, James J.	1
Kaplan, Sandra N.	1

Publication Type

Journal Articles	2
Reports - Descriptive	1
Reports - Evaluative	1

Education Level

Audience

Location

Laws, Policies, & Programs

No Child Left Behind Act 2001

Assessments and Surveys

What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Showing all 2 results Save | Export

Where We Stand Determines the Answers to the Question: Can the No Child Left behind Legislation Be Beneficial to Gifted Students?

Peer reviewed

Kaplan, Sandra N. – Roeper Review, 2004

Just as it is said that beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, so it could be said that the impact of any legislation is in the interpretation of the reader as administrator, teacher, student, or parent. The value of any educational legislation is equivocal and dependent on two basic factors: philosophy and practice. The need to take a stand and…

Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Legislation, Academically Gifted

No Child Left Behind and Gifted Education

Peer reviewed

Gallagher, James J. – Roeper Review, 2004

There has been no piece of education legislation in the past decade that has stirred so much comment and controversy as the No Child Left Behind Act (P.L. 107-110; Elementary and Secondary Education Amendments of 2001). This comprehensive law is designed to ensure quality education for all students, particularly those at risk for academic problems…

Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Testing Programs, Elementary Secondary Education, Educational Quality