Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
Change | 1 |
Education Quarterly Reviews | 1 |
Journal of Law and Education | 1 |
National Center for the Study… | 1 |
National Center for the Study… | 1 |
Professional File | 1 |
Author
Burke, Edward J. | 1 |
Doherty, Robert E. | 1 |
Douglas, Joel M., Ed. | 1 |
Grenig, Jay E. | 1 |
Hunter, Richard J., Jr. | 1 |
Levenstein, Aaron, E. | 1 |
Lozada, Hector R. | 1 |
Shannon, John H. | 1 |
Publication Type
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 4 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Collected Works - Serials | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reference Materials - General | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
National Labor Relations Act | 7 |
National Labor Relations… | 4 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hunter, Richard J., Jr.; Lozada, Hector R.; Shannon, John H. – Education Quarterly Reviews, 2021
This article is a summary discussion of the main issues faced by faculty at private, often church-sponsored, universities who sought to be represented by a union in collective bargaining with their employers. The discussion begins by tracing the origins of the rule that faculty at private universities are managers and not employees under the aegis…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Labor Legislation, Court Litigation, College Faculty
Doherty, Robert E. – Professional File, 1973
The specific problems of private institutions concerned with faculty collective bargaining are discussed in relation to the National Labor Relations Act. Emphasis is placed on the rationale of and the implications for collective bargaining. The rationale of collective bargaining is viewed in light of the distribution of privileges, private…
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Educational Finance, Higher Education
Levenstein, Aaron, E. – National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education Newsletter, 1980
The impact of the Supreme Court Decision, "National Labor Relations Board versus Yeshiva University," on collective bargaining at colleges and universities is considered. The basic thrust of the majority decision is that faculty are not under the umbrella of the National Labor Relations Act and that administration may refuse to negotiate…
Descriptors: Administrators, Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Court Litigation

Grenig, Jay E. – Journal of Law and Education, 1980
The decision will have little impact on public universities in those states that have public employee bargaining statutes expressly including university faculty members. However, it may provide ammunition for anticollective bargaining forces in states where the legislatures are considering whether to extend collective bargaining to university…
Descriptors: Administrators, Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Court Litigation
Congress of the U.S., Washington, DC. House Committee on Education and Labor. – 1985
Hearings on proposed legislation to amend the National Labor Relations Act are presented. H.R. 3291 would protect the right of faculty at private educational institutions to engage in collective bargaining, while H.R. 5107 is intended to make meaningful the right of performing artists to engage in collective bargaining. H.R. 3291 stipulates that…
Descriptors: Administrators, Artists, Collective Bargaining, College Faculty
Douglas, Joel M., Ed. – National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Professions Newsletter, 1982
Campus collective bargaining proceedings associated with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) versus Yeshiva University case are analyzed. The number of institutions exercising Yeshiva-like claims has risen to 49, and the vast majority of the claimants are institutions that have challenged the right of the faculty to organize and bargain…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Court Litigation

Burke, Edward J. – Change, 1980
The Supreme Court ruling on the Yeshiva case, which ruled that Yeshiva faculty are managerial employees and therefore not protected in their organizing efforts by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), is discussed. Consequences of the ruling are to discourage faculty from establishing unions and to foster numerous court challenges. (MLW)
Descriptors: Administrators, Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Court Litigation