NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
United States Supreme Court, Washington, DC. – 2003
This legal document addresses whether the University of Michigan's use of racial preferences in undergraduate admissions violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d) or 42 U.S.C. 1981. This brief filed in support of the petitioners by the federal government argues that…
Descriptors: Access to Education, Affirmative Action, Civil Rights, College Admission
United States Supreme Court, Washington, DC. – 2003
This legal document examines whether the University of Michigan Law School's use of racial preferences in student admissions violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et. seq.), or 42 U.S.C. 1981. This brief filed by the federal government in support of the…
Descriptors: Access to Education, Affirmative Action, Civil Rights, College Admission
United States Supreme Court, Washington, DC. – 2003
This legal document addresses whether the Court should reaffirm its decision in Regents of University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), holding that the educational benefits which flow from a diverse student body to an institution of higher education, its students, and the public it serves are sufficiently compelling to permit the…
Descriptors: Access to Education, Affirmative Action, Civil Rights, College Admission
United States Supreme Court, Washington, DC. – 2003
This legal document addresses whether the Court should reaffirm its decision in Regents of University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), holding that the educational benefits which flow from a diverse student body to an institution of higher education, its students, and the public it serves are sufficiently compelling to permit the…
Descriptors: Access to Education, Affirmative Action, College Admission, College Students