NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Nolte, M. Chester – American School Board Journal, 1975
Discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Goss v. Lopez that public schools may not suspend a student for 10 days or less without giving him advance notice of the charges against him and allowing him to respond to the charges. (JG)
Descriptors: Discipline Policy, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education, School Law
National Association of Secondary School Principals, Reston, VA. – 1982
The basic requirements for fair school disciplinary proceedings were set down in the Supreme Court decision of Goss v. Lopez. The requirements are that students be given oral or written notice of both the nature of the rule (violation of which will result in punishment) and the nature of the specific violation and the intended punishment. In…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Court Litigation, Disabilities, Discipline Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Levine, Alan H.; Kola, Arthur A. – Journal of Law and Education, 1975
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education
Reutter, E. Edmund, Jr. – IAR Research Bulletin, 1976
Discusses recent federal court rulings setting minimal procedural requirements governing the administration of student discipline by school officials. (JG)
Descriptors: Civil Liberties, Discipline, Discipline Policy, Due Process
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Buss, William G. – Journal of Law and Education, 1975
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education
National Association of Secondary School Principals, Reston, VA. – 1975
In Goss v. Lopez and Wood v. Strickland, the U.S. Supreme Court spelled out what due process means as it applies to suspension and expulsion of public school students. In Goss v. Lopez, the Court decided that a student who is suspended for up to ten days without a hearing is entitled to due process of law: "students . . . must be given some…
Descriptors: Board of Education Policy, Boards of Education, Discipline Policy, Due Process
Bittle, Edgar H. – 1981
Chapter 18 of a book on school law summarizes court decisions that have established the responsibility of school officials, when taking disciplinary action, to conduct hearings to protect employees' and students' due process rights. The courts have used a balancing test to determine whether a trial procedure or a more informal procedure can be…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Discipline Policy
Howard, Estelle; And Others – 1982
One of a series of secondary level teaching units presenting case studies with pro and con analyses of particular legal problems, the document presents a student's lesson plan, a teacher's lesson plan, and a lawyer's lesson plan designed to expose students to the concept of procedural due process with particular reference to the Supreme Court's…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Conflict Resolution, Court Litigation, Discipline
Price, Janet R.; And Others – 1988
This book, addressed directly to students, defines the scope of school officials' power to regulate students' lives and these officials' responsibilities to provide services and protection to students. The chapters outline the law in specific areas, but they all reflect a common theme: school officials can make and enforce only reasonable rules of…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Activism, Civil Liberties, Civil Rights