Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Constitutional Law | 3 |
Freedom of Speech | 3 |
Public Colleges | 3 |
Christianity | 2 |
Religion | 2 |
Beliefs | 1 |
Censorship | 1 |
College Environment | 1 |
College Faculty | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Compliance (Legal) | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
J. Cody Nielsen | 1 |
Kissel, Adam | 1 |
Laura Beltz, | 1 |
Mayhew, Matthew J. | 1 |
Monica Sanford | 1 |
Robinson, Jenna A. | 1 |
Rockenbach, Alyssa N. | 1 |
Shaheen, Musbah | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
West Virginia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
First Amendment | 3 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
J. Cody Nielsen; Monica Sanford – Journal of College and Character, 2024
Higher education in the 2020s remains deeply divided on the role of religion, or what the Council on the Advancement of Standards (CAS) in 2023 describes as "religious, secular, and spiritual identities." In two previous articles in this Journal, one 2010 article by the late Peter Magolda and one in 2014 by Perry Glanzer, detail the ways…
Descriptors: Public Colleges, Religious Factors, School Community Relationship, Christianity
Kissel, Adam; Laura Beltz,; Robinson, Jenna A. – James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal, 2022
The U.S. and West Virginia constitutions acknowledge the right to free speech, which must be protected at public colleges, but Senate Bill 657, which became law in 2021, requires that public colleges protect "any lawful verbal and nonverbal speech." Furthermore, many private colleges also promise free speech to their students. However a…
Descriptors: Freedom of Speech, Public Colleges, Private Colleges, College Students
Shaheen, Musbah; Mayhew, Matthew J.; Rockenbach, Alyssa N. – Journal of College Student Development, 2022
This paper focuses on how undergraduate students on five public university campuses perceived and reacted to religious coercion. We identified three sources of coercion: (a) public proselytizers, (b) peers, and (c) academic faculty whose expression of beliefs was perceived as implicitly coercive by students who often connected religious beliefs to…
Descriptors: Religion, Undergraduate Students, Public Colleges, College Faculty