Descriptor
| Employment Opportunities | 1 |
| Equal Opportunities (Jobs) | 1 |
| Federal Legislation | 1 |
| Females | 1 |
| Job Development | 1 |
| Legal Responsibility | 1 |
| Salary Wage Differentials | 1 |
| Sex Discrimination | 1 |
| Supreme Court Litigation | 1 |
| Wages | 1 |
Source
| Houston Law Review | 1 |
Author
| Stanford, Richard Alan | 1 |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Equal Pay Act 1963 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedStanford, Richard Alan – Houston Law Review, 1974
The Supreme Court held in Corning Glass Works cases involving male only employees for night shifts that the time of day worked could constitute a factor other than sex whereby the wage differential might qualify as an exception under the Equal Pay Act. Shift differentials could be legal if proven to be nondiscriminatory. (LBH)
Descriptors: Employment Opportunities, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Federal Legislation, Females
