NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hughes, William – American Secondary Education, 1999
In May 1999, the U.S. Supreme Court, in "Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education," held that school districts can be liable for damages under Title IX for failing to stop peer sexual harassment. The case involved school staff's disregard of a fifth-grader's alleged harassment by a male classmate. (MLH)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Legal Responsibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McClain, Michael W. – Journal of Law and Education, 1999
Analyzes the state of the law regarding peer sexual harassment. In "Davis" the Supreme Court ruled that a school district can be held liable for a student's sexual harassment of another student. Prior to this, lower courts were not uniform in their treatment of this charge. (Contains 47 references.) (MLF)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts, Legal Responsibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
DeMitchell, Todd A. – International Journal of Educational Reform, 1996
Two federal appellate courts heard cases with similar fact patterns and the same issue--are school districts liable for student-caused sexually hostile environments under Title IX? Since the courts reached different conclusions, this issue seems ripe for consideration by the Supreme Court. No student should have to run a gauntlet of abuse to…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts, Females
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1996
Last year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled in "Davis" that a student can sue for damages if school officials know a student is being sexually harassed but fail to intervene. (MLF)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts, Legal Responsibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Routh, Joanna L. – Journal of Law and Education, 1999
Now that the Supreme Court in "Davis" has determined that schools can be sued for what one child does to another, schools will have a hard time avoiding frivolous lawsuits. The difficulty of analyzing the "Davis" decision lies in drawing a line between teasing and harassment. The conduct of certain six- and seven- year-olds…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts, Guidelines
Imber, Michael – American School Board Journal, 2002
Discuss implications for school-district student-on-student sexual harassment policies of "Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, wherein the Supreme Court ruled that a school can be held liable for not protecting students from sexual harassment by other students. States that schools also have a moral and educational duty to prevent…
Descriptors: Boards of Education, Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Legal Responsibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Romano, Patricia – Journal of Law and Education, 2001
The Supreme Court decision in "Davis" added a fiscal incentive to school districts to prevent peer sexual harassment by ruling that educational institutions that show deliberate indifference to known harassment between students may be liable for the resultant damages. (Contains 212 references.) (MLF)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Aid, Federal Courts
Miles, Albert S.; Miller, Michael T.; Newman, Richard E. – School Business Affairs, 1999
Although discrimination is no longer routinely accepted in education, incidents of gender-based discrimination and harassment are being reported in record numbers. Schools must ensure equality of female athletic facilities; be aware of oral-contract, tort, and sexual harassment pitfalls; and meet Title IX's three-pronged compliance test. Contains…
Descriptors: Athletics, Compliance (Legal), Contracts, Court Litigation