NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
ERIC Number: ED650742
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2020
Pages: 150
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: 979-8-5570-2913-1
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
Equity in Action: Estimating the Association between Funding, Expenditures, Tuition, and Affirmative Action Case Law on Enrollment and Completion Rates at Selective Colleges
Tiffany Marie Okolo
ProQuest LLC, Ph.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University
I conduct a series of analyses aimed at assessing equity in selective American colleges over a 20+ year time frame. My main measures of equity are enrollment and completion in selective colleges, which I disaggregate by race/ethnicity. After creating an institutional-level panel data set with variables on college revenues and expenses, tuition, institutional control, and affirmative action case law decisions, I estimate a Generalized Least Squares (GLS) model with institutional level random fixed effects to identify factors associated with enrollment and degree completion for white and non-white students at selective United States colleges. My results suggest that affirmative action case law is associated with changes in enrollment and degree completion rates of white and non-white student alike. Increasing equity for non-white students does not compromise equity for white students. There was a statistically significant relationship between federal spending, enrollment, and degree completion for non-white students. When selective colleges increased tuition, instructional costs, academic support services expenditures, and student support services, Asian American/Pacific Islander students were likely to see enrollment and degree completion declines. Degree completion and enrollment differences were observed for Asian American/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, and white students at public, private and for-profit colleges. In the years after the "Adams" and "Hopwood" court decisions, equity for non-white students declined at selective colleges. Enrollment and degree completion for non-white students increased following "Grutter," "Gratz," "Coalition," and "Fisher" decisions. Enrollment of white students increased following "Fordice" and "Hopwood." Degree completion for white students increased post "Coalition" and decreased post "Fisher." [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2222/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]
ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2222/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
Publication Type: Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Laws, Policies, & Programs: Hopwood v Texas; Adams v Califano; Adams v Richardson; Grutter et al v Bollinger et al; Gratz et al v Bollinger et al; Fisher v University of Texas at Austin; United States v Fordice
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A