NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Percy, Chris; Tomlinson, Michael; Huddleston, Prue – Journal of Education and Work, 2020
This paper identifies a nascent trend in several countries regarding increased collection, public availability and use of destination data for graduates of secondary education, with policy ambitions to support pupil-level decision-making and drive provider-level accountability. This trend mirrors the previous development of such data for higher…
Descriptors: Educational Trends, Data Collection, Secondary Education, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mølstad, Christina E.; Pettersson, Daniel; Forsberg, Eva – European Educational Research Journal, 2017
This study investigates knowledge structures and scientific communication using bibliometric methods to explore scientific knowledge production and dissemination. The aim is to develop knowledge about this growing field by investigating studies using international large-scale assessment (ILSA) data, with a specific focus on those using Programme…
Descriptors: Knowledge Management, Scientific and Technical Information, Bibliometrics, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leckie, George; Goldstein, Harvey – British Educational Research Journal, 2017
Since 1992, the UK Government has published so-called "school league tables" summarising the average General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) "attainment" and "progress" made by pupils in each state-funded secondary school in England. While the headline measure of school attainment has remained the percentage…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Achievement Rating, Academic Achievement, Secondary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Hong, Guanglei – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2013
When using time series accountability data to evaluate system-wide education policies, concurrent changes often pose threats to internal validity. The standard difference-in-differences (DID) method resorts to a non-equivalent comparison group whose average outcome change is due to such confounding. This strategy relies on the strong assumption…
Descriptors: Accountability, Scores, Comparative Analysis, Algebra