Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Criticism | 1 |
| Elementary School Science | 1 |
| Middle School Students | 1 |
| Persuasive Discourse | 1 |
| Questioning Techniques | 1 |
| Science Instruction | 1 |
| Self Efficacy | 1 |
| Thinking Skills | 1 |
Source
| Science Education | 1 |
Author
| Alicia N. Herrera | 1 |
| E. Michael Nussbaum | 1 |
| Harsha N. Perera | 1 |
| Ian J. Dove | 1 |
| Kristoffer R. Carroll | 1 |
| LeAnn G. Putney | 1 |
| Lixian Tian | 1 |
| Margarita Huerta | 1 |
| Michael S. Van Winkle | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkE. Michael Nussbaum; Michael S. Van Winkle; Lixian Tian; LeAnn G. Putney; Margarita Huerta; Harsha N. Perera; Ian J. Dove; Alicia N. Herrera; Kristoffer R. Carroll – Science Education, 2024
Critiquing arguments is important for K-12 science students to learn but not emphasized by the predominant claim-evidence-reasoning (CER) argumentation model. Drawing on the work of Yu and Zenker (2020), and Dove and Nussbaum (2018), we developed a tool for supplementing CER with critical questions (CQs) from philosophy that cover most, if not…
Descriptors: Science Instruction, Middle School Students, Elementary School Science, Criticism
