Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| At Risk Students | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Diagnostic Tests | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Oral Reading | 1 |
| Psychometrics | 1 |
| Reading Failure | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Reading & Writing Quarterly | 1 |
Author
| Burns, Matthew K. | 1 |
| Hodgson, Jennifer | 1 |
| Kanive, Rebecca | 1 |
| Klingbeil, David A. | 1 |
| Parker, David C. | 1 |
| Scholin, Sarah E. | 1 |
| Zaslofsky, Anne F. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Minnesota | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkParker, David C.; Zaslofsky, Anne F.; Burns, Matthew K.; Kanive, Rebecca; Hodgson, Jennifer; Scholin, Sarah E.; Klingbeil, David A. – Reading & Writing Quarterly, 2015
The availability of psychometrically sound and usable universal screeners is a key component to successful early identification within a response-to-intervention model. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of oral reading fluency (ORF) and an informal reading inventory for identifying students considered at risk for…
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Psychometrics, Elementary School Students, Rural Schools
