NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
California Education Code1
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 60 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li Zhao; Junjie Peng; Shiqi Ke; Kang Lee – Educational Psychology Review, 2024
Unproctored and teacher-proctored exams have been widely used to prevent cheating at many universities worldwide. However, no empirical studies have directly compared their effectiveness in promoting academic integrity in actual exams. To address this significant gap, in four preregistered field studies, we examined the effectiveness of…
Descriptors: Supervision, Tests, Testing, Integrity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Som Nath Ghimire; Upaj Bhattarai; Raj K. Baral – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
The problem of academic dishonesty in general and exam cheating in particular, has been ubiquitous in schools, colleges, and universities around the world. This paper reports on the findings from teachers' and students' experiences and perceptions of exam cheating at Nepali schools, colleges, and universities. In so doing, the paper highlights the…
Descriptors: Ethics, Cheating, Foreign Countries, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Alin, Pauli; Arendt, Anne; Gurell, Seth – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
As higher education is shifting to virtual teaching, examinations are increasingly conducted virtually, often proctored. Unfortunately, virtual proctored examinations--proctored remotely using technologies--can be prone to cheating. Some anti-cheating measures can be built into the virtual proctoring technologies, but cheating can still occur.…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Virtual Classrooms, Tests, Supervision
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Philip M. Newton; Keioni Essex – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
Academic misconduct is a threat to the validity and reliability of online examinations, and media reports suggest that misconduct spiked dramatically in higher education during the emergency shift to online exams caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reviewed survey research to determine how common it is for university students to admit…
Descriptors: Cheating, Tests, Electronic Learning, COVID-19
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Glass, Arnold L.; Kang, Mengxue – Educational Psychology, 2022
Performance on homework questions was compared with performance on related exam questions querying the same fact or principle, was used to assess the effect of answering online homework questions on subsequent exam performance. A distinctive pattern of performance was found for some students in which superior performance on online homework…
Descriptors: Homework, Academic Achievement, Tests, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li Zhao; Junjie Peng; Xinchen Yang; Weihao Yan; Shiqi Ke; Kanza Batool; Yaxin Li; Kang Lee – Studies in Higher Education, 2024
Academic cheating is a pervasive problem in many universities globally. The present double-blind randomized controlled field experiment tested whether reminding university students about academic dishonesty sanction policies would reduce their cheating in an actual exam. Students were assigned to either a Sanction Reminder or a No Reminder…
Descriptors: Cheating, Ethics, Discipline Problems, Discipline Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pritpal Singh Bhullar; Mahesh Joshi; Ritesh Chugh – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
ChatGPT has emerged as a significant subject of research and exploration, casting a critical spotlight on teaching and learning practices in the higher education domain. This study examines the most influential articles, leading journals, and productive countries concerning citations and publications related to ChatGPT in higher education, while…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Synchronous Communication, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Nurdin, Erdawati; MZ, Zubaidah Amir; Nufus, Hayatun; Thakur, Deepti; Shah, Firdous A.; Dube, Rakesh; Wijaya, Tommy Tanu – Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning, 2021
The COVID-19 outbreak has an impact on the provision of education. One of them is the process of online assessment or examination. Difficulties occur during online exams; weak supervision can increase cheating behavior among students. Generally, teachers or lecturers think about how to prevent this behavior. However, what if they are allowed to…
Descriptors: Mathematics Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Cheating, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lim, Kieran Fergus – Physics Education, 2022
Undergraduate first-year courses are often mandatory for students in a variety of majors and degrees. Many students view these core courses as of little interest and relevance, which is associated with lack of motivation for study and can lead to cheating. Contract cheating in text-based is difficult to detect and prove. Contract cheating in…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Contracts, Cheating, Assignments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Valizadeh, Mohammadreza – Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 2022
This study aimed at highlighting the Turkish higher education learners' perceptions of cheating on online learning programs, the ways of, causes for, and some suggestions to minimize cheating. Both quantitative and qualitative data were gathered from 163 online learners via a questionnaire including both open-ended and close-ended questions. Data…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Online Courses, Cheating, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harper, Rowena; Bretag, Tracey; Rundle, Kiata – Higher Education Research and Development, 2021
This article contributes to an emerging body of research on the role of assessment design in the prevention and detection of contract cheating. Drawing on the largest contract cheating dataset gathered to date (see cheatingandassessment.edu.au), this article examines the types of assignments and exams in which students self-reported having engaged…
Descriptors: Cheating, Identification, College Students, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Darmansyah; Darman, Regina Ade – International Journal of Instruction, 2022
Cheating behaviour in exams in the form of plagiarism occurs in school and college education. Academic fraud is common at the higher education level at the undergraduate, master's level, and even at the doctoral level. Academic fraud is getting out of control and is difficult to eradicate on examinations carried out online without strict…
Descriptors: Plagiarism, Doctoral Programs, Doctoral Students, Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jill Oeding; Theresa Gunn; Aleisha Jones – Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2024
This quantitative study is designed to determine the impact of online proctoring software in graduate courses. The researchers compared the final grades of two groups of online graduate students who were taught by professors who had online exams before and after the university implemented proctoring software. Essentially the only difference…
Descriptors: Supervision, Electronic Learning, Computer Software, Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rajlaxmi Chouhan – Learning: Research and Practice, 2024
This paper presents simple and intuitive strategies for effective online assessment of a freshman engineering course. The proposed strategies for unproctored online exams include creating multiple sets with identical options, using image-format questions, maintaining short duration of exam, and employing a rotational assignment. Unlike a…
Descriptors: Engineering Education, Tests, Electronic Learning, Supervision
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Daniel Woldeab; Thomas Brothen – International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 2024
In this study, we analyze undergraduate student responses in 1,364 surveys to better understand student reactions to online proctoring. We present findings regarding two aspects of student reactions to online proctoring: First, we assess whether students believe that the act of cheating in online exams diminishes the legitimacy of their courses;…
Descriptors: Supervision, Tests, Online Courses, Cheating
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4