Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Decision Making | 2 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 2 |
| Grants | 2 |
| Selection Criteria | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Alignment (Education) | 1 |
| Best Practices | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Career Readiness | 1 |
| College Readiness | 1 |
| Competition | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| João M. Santos | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Race to the Top | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkJoão M. Santos – Research Evaluation, 2024
The allocation of scientific funding through grant programs is crucial for research advancement. While independent peer panels typically handle evaluations, their decisions can lean on personal preferences that go beyond the stated criteria, leading to inconsistencies and potential biases. Given these concerns, our study employs a novel method,…
Descriptors: Grants, Program Proposals, Funding Formulas, Scientific Research
Race to the Top District Competition: The Data Quality Campaign's Comments on ED's Proposed Criteria
Download full textData Quality Campaign, 2012
The Data Quality Campaign (DQC) submits these comments in response to the US Department of Education's (ED) draft requirements, priorities, selection criteria, and definitions for the Race to the Top District (RTT-D) competition. DQC applauds ED for including the following components of the proposal: (1) Data is acknowledged throughout the…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Competition, Educational Change, Best Practices
