Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Doctoral Dissertations | 1 |
| Doctoral Students | 1 |
| Examiners | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Formative Evaluation | 1 |
| Oral Language | 1 |
| Revision (Written Composition) | 1 |
| Student Reaction | 1 |
| Supervisors | 1 |
Source
| Australian Universities'… | 1 |
Author
| Budd, Janene | 1 |
| Dally, Kerry | 1 |
| Holbrook, Allyson | 1 |
| Lovat, Terence | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textDally, Kerry; Holbrook, Allyson; Lovat, Terence; Budd, Janene – Australian Universities' Review, 2019
Doctoral thesis examination is the litmus test for doctoral quality. Of those candidates who reach examination, most are notified they have more work to do on their thesis. Receiving and responding to feedback are integral parts of a formal learning process that continues until the final thesis is submitted. However, little is known about what…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Feedback (Response), Examiners, Doctoral Dissertations
