Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Grade 10 | 6 |
Grade 11 | 6 |
Grade 6 | 6 |
Grade 7 | 6 |
Grade 8 | 6 |
Grade 9 | 6 |
Grade 12 | 4 |
Grade 5 | 4 |
Test Construction | 4 |
Test Reliability | 4 |
Test Validity | 4 |
More ▼ |
Source
Partnership for Assessment of… | 2 |
Asian Journal of Distance… | 1 |
ETS Research Report Series | 1 |
Journal of Psychoeducational… | 1 |
Learning Disabilities: A… | 1 |
Author
Andrea Ochoa | 1 |
Attali, Yigal | 1 |
Boon, Richard T. | 1 |
Burstein, Jill | 1 |
Cornelius-Freyre, Melissa | 1 |
Crystal Spring | 1 |
Hintz, Anna-Maria | 1 |
Paal, Michael | 1 |
Zeytinli Ünal, Melike | 1 |
Çakiroglu, Ünal | 1 |
Ünal, Suat | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 6 |
Grade 10 | 6 |
Grade 11 | 6 |
Grade 6 | 6 |
Grade 7 | 6 |
Grade 8 | 6 |
Grade 9 | 6 |
High Schools | 6 |
Intermediate Grades | 6 |
Junior High Schools | 6 |
Middle Schools | 6 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Turkey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Graduate Management Admission… | 1 |
Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Crystal Spring; Andrea Ochoa – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2024
This study sought to develop an Academic School Climate Scale measuring students' perceptions of the learning environments at their schools. With a pilot sample of 1,265 students and validation sample of 14,773 students in Grades 4-12 in schools across the U.S., results of EFA and CFA supported a bifactor model with a general factor and three…
Descriptors: Educational Environment, Measures (Individuals), Student Attitudes, Grade 4
Zeytinli Ünal, Melike; Ünal, Suat; Çakiroglu, Ünal – Asian Journal of Distance Education, 2023
The efficiency of the distance education process can be evaluated from various aspects. One of the most important indicators in revealing the effectiveness of the distance education process is the satisfaction level of the learners. This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable satisfaction with distance education scale for secondary and high…
Descriptors: Distance Education, Test Construction, Test Validity, Test Reliability
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, 2018
The purpose of this technical report is to describe the third operational administration of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) assessments in the 2016-2017 academic year. PARCC is a state-led consortium creating next-generation assessments that, compared to traditional K-12 assessments, more accurately…
Descriptors: College Readiness, Career Readiness, Common Core State Standards, Language Arts
Boon, Richard T.; Paal, Michael; Hintz, Anna-Maria; Cornelius-Freyre, Melissa – Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 2015
The purpose of this article is to provide a review on the effectiveness of story mapping to improve the reading comprehension skills of middle and high school (Grades 6-12) students with learning disabilities (LD). An extensive review of the special education research-base revealed twelve (N = 12) story mapping intervention studies that met our…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Learning Disabilities, Intervention, Middle School Students
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, 2017
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) is a state-led consortium designed to create next-generation assessments that, compared to traditional K-12 assessments, more accurately measure student progress toward college and career readiness. The PARCC assessments are aligned to the Common Core State Standards…
Descriptors: College Readiness, Career Readiness, Common Core State Standards, Language Arts
Attali, Yigal; Burstein, Jill – ETS Research Report Series, 2005
The e-rater® system has been used by ETS for automated essay scoring since 1999. This paper describes a new version of e-rater (v.2.0) that differs from the previous one (v.1.3) with regard to the feature set and model building approach. The paper describes the new version, compares the new and previous versions in terms of performance, and…
Descriptors: Essay Tests, Automation, Scoring, Comparative Analysis