Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 20 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Aagaard, Lola | 1 |
Almond, Richard J. | 1 |
Bay, Darlene | 1 |
Benson, Wendi L. | 1 |
Berg, Ronan M. G. | 1 |
Bromley, Susan | 1 |
Calkins, Robin | 1 |
Daly-Olm, Talei | 1 |
Damgaard, Morten | 1 |
Desrochers, Marcie N. | 1 |
DiCarlo, Stephen E. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 22 |
Reports - Research | 14 |
Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 22 |
Postsecondary Education | 7 |
Audience
Location
Argentina | 1 |
Australia | 1 |
Canada | 1 |
China | 1 |
Michigan | 1 |
Netherlands | 1 |
New York | 1 |
South Africa | 1 |
Tanzania | 1 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Wechsler Adult Intelligence… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Headrick, Jonathon; Harris-Reeves, Brooke; Daly-Olm, Talei – Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2021
Collaborative testing is recognised as an effective assessment approach linked to positive student outcomes including enhanced test performance and reduced assessment anxiety. While collaborative testing approaches appear beneficial to university students in general, it is unclear whether students from different year levels benefit to the same…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Undergraduate Students, Foreign Countries, Student Attitudes
Rayne Bozeman; Robyn K. Mallett; Linas Mitchell; R. Scott Tindale – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2024
Two-phase testing assesses individual performance (phase 1) and then allows collaborative learning within small groups (phase 2). While groups typically outperform individuals, less is known about the social decision schemes that influence member collaboration. In a classroom setting, we compared individual and group performance on a standard test…
Descriptors: Testing, Group Testing, Cooperative Learning, Learning Experience
Eastridge, June A.; Benson, Wendi L. – Teaching of Psychology, 2020
Research on collaborative testing has shown that it decreases test anxiety, increases learning and critical thinking skills, and allows students to practice collaboration and teamwork. However, it has most often been used as a second test following traditional individual testing. This quasi-experimental study compared two models of collaborative…
Descriptors: Group Testing, Models, Statistics, Test Anxiety
Mbalamula, Yazidu Saidi – Pedagogical Research, 2018
The study analyzes students' performance scores in formative assessments depicting the individual and group settings. A case study design was adopted using quantitative approach to extract data of 198 undergraduate students. Data were analyzed quantitatively using descriptive statistics--means and frequencies; spearman correlations, multiple…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Undergraduate Students, Formative Evaluation, Academic Achievement
Vogler, Jane S.; Robinson, Daniel H. – Journal of Experimental Education, 2016
In two experiments, 90 undergraduates took six tests as part of an educational psychology course. Using a crossover design, students took three tests individually without feedback and then took the same test again, following the process of team-based testing (TBT), in teams in which the members reached consensus for each question and answered…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Group Testing, Teamwork, Educational Psychology
Bay, Darlene; Pacharn, Parunchana – Accounting Education, 2017
Cooperative learning techniques have been found to be quite successful in a variety of learning environments. However, in university-level accounting courses, investigations of the efficacy of cooperative learning pedagogical methods have produced mixed results at best. To continue the search for a cooperative learning method that is effective in…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Group Testing, Accounting, Advanced Courses
Kolowich, Steve – Chronicle of Higher Education, 2013
Hailey Schnorr has spent years peering into the bedrooms, kitchens, and dorm rooms of students via Webcam. In her job proctoring online tests for universities, she has learned to focus mainly on students' eyes. Ms. Schnorr works for ProctorU, a company hired by universities to police the integrity of their online courses. ProctorU is part of a…
Descriptors: Online Courses, Computer Assisted Testing, Video Technology, Group Testing
Pandey, Carol; Kapitanoff, Susan – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2011
This research investigated the relationships among test performance, anxiety, and the quality of interaction during collaborative testing of college students. It also explored which students are most likely to benefit from collaborative testing. It was randomly determined whether a student would take each of six examinations alone or with a…
Descriptors: Test Wiseness, Individual Testing, Correlation, Test Anxiety
Schroeder, Jacob; Murphy, Kristen L.; Holme, Thomas A. – Journal of Chemical Education, 2012
General chemistry tests from the Examinations Institute of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society have been analyzed to identify factors that may influence how individual test items perform. In this paper, issues of item order (position within a set of items that comprise a test) and answer order (position of correct…
Descriptors: Chemistry, Test Items, Individual Testing, Test Construction
Berg, Ronan M. G.; Plovsing, Ronni R.; Damgaard, Morten – Advances in Physiology Education, 2012
Quiz-based and collaborative teaching strategies have previously been found to be efficient for the improving meaningful learning of physiology during lectures. These approaches have, however, not been investigated during laboratory exercises. In the present study, we compared the impact of solving quizzes individually and in groups with…
Descriptors: Medical Students, College Students, Intervention, Student Evaluation
Tendeiro, Jorge N.; Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
This article extends the work by Armstrong and Shi on CUmulative SUM (CUSUM) person-fit methodology. The authors present new theoretical considerations concerning the use of CUSUM person-fit statistics based on likelihood ratios for the purpose of detecting cheating and random guessing by individual test takers. According to the Neyman-Pearson…
Descriptors: Cheating, Individual Testing, Adaptive Testing, Statistics
Jin, Yan; Fan, Jinsong – Language Testing, 2011
The purpose of the Test for English Majors (TEM) is to measure the English proficiency of Chinese university undergraduates majoring in English Language and Literature and to examine whether these students meet the required levels of English language abilities as specified in the National College English Teaching Syllabus for English Majors…
Descriptors: Majors (Students), Advisory Committees, Individual Testing, Examiners
Scafe, Marla G. – American Journal of Business Education, 2011
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of group testing as a pedagogical technique to enhance learning in a difficult subject such as statistics. Individual test scores were compared to their group test scores for the same, identical test. A t test was used to compare the scores for 157 randomly selected MBA students enrolled…
Descriptors: Group Testing, Individual Testing, Statistical Analysis, Comparative Analysis
Leight, Hayley; Saunders, Cheston; Calkins, Robin; Withers, Michelle – CBE - Life Sciences Education, 2012
Collaborative testing has been shown to improve performance but not always content retention. In this study, we investigated whether collaborative testing could improve both performance and content retention in a large, introductory biology course. Students were semirandomly divided into two groups based on their performances on exam 1. Each group…
Descriptors: Individual Testing, Biology, Scoring, Group Testing
Giuliodori, Mauricio J.; Lujan, Heidi L.; DiCarlo, Stephen E. – Advances in Physiology Education, 2008
We used collaborative group testing in a veterinary physiology course (65 students) to test the hypothesis that all students (e.g., high-performing and low-performing students of each group) benefit from collaborative group testing. In this format, students answered questions in the traditional format as individuals. Immediately after completing…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Individual Testing, Group Testing, Cooperative Learning
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2