NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 1,173 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huiying Cai; Xun Yan – Language Testing, 2024
Rater comments tend to be qualitatively analyzed to indicate raters' application of rating scales. This study applied natural language processing (NLP) techniques to quantify meaningful, behavioral information from a corpus of rater comments and triangulated that information with a many-facet Rasch measurement (MFRM) analysis of rater scores. The…
Descriptors: Natural Language Processing, Item Response Theory, Rating Scales, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jackie Tuck – Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 2025
Purpose: This paper aims to show how an Academic Literacies lens can contribute to a deeper understanding of writing for a professional doctorate (PD) by focusing both on the language of supervisors' written feedback and on student and supervisor perspectives on feedback throughout Year 1 (Y1). Design/methodology/approach: Firstly, written…
Descriptors: Professional Education, Doctoral Programs, Doctoral Students, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Joan Li; Nikhil Kumar Jangamreddy; Ryuto Hisamoto; Ruchita Bhansali; Amalie Dyda; Luke Zaphir; Mashhuda Glencross – Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2024
Generative artificial intelligence technologies, such as ChatGPT, bring an unprecedented change in education by leveraging the power of natural language processing and machine learning. Employing ChatGPT to assist with marking written assessment presents multiple advantages including scalability, improved consistency, eliminating biases associated…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Artificial Intelligence, Grading, Scoring Rubrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li Dong – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2024
Within the context of Chinese university education, effective communication in the field of second language writing heavily relies on lexical complexity, yet the role of writing feedback perception in relation to lexical complexity remains elusive. This study introduces a comprehensive writing feedback perception model encompassing perceptions of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Students, Feedback (Response), Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jianhua Zhang; Lawrence Jun Zhang – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2024
This study mainly explored the effects of teacher feedback, peer feedback and automated feedback on the use of metacognitive strategies in EFL writing. Ninety-seven participants were recruited and divided into three groups, who received two months of feedback from teachers, peers and an automatic writing evaluation system, respectively, and then…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Metacognition, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Yang Yang; Ze Zheng – Contemporary Educational Technology, 2024
In the existing literature, scholars have proposed various indices to measure the lexical richness (LR) of English as a foreign language (EFL) writing. However, there are currently issues of redundant indices and inconsistent usage. Attempting to address the research question of which indices are the most sensitive and effective ones to…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Lexicology, English (Second Language), Writing (Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Austin Bailey; Caroline Wilkinson – Journal of Basic Writing, 2023
Responding to growing interests in alternative assessment practices, this article examines ungrading in two composition courses at a public university classified as a Hispanic-Serving Institution, detailing its implementation by two instructors in an Accelerated Learning Program composition class and a standalone composition class. Utilizing…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Writing (Composition), Writing Instruction, Alternative Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Xu Li; Shiyan Jiang; Yue Hu; Xiaoxiao Feng; Wenzhi Chen; Fan Ouyang – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
While the importance of feedback in education is well established, the effects of structured knowledge in collaborative academic writing remains uncertain. This study introduces an academic writing feedback tool that combines structured knowledge mining, analysis, and visualization. An empirical experiment was conducted in a second-year university…
Descriptors: Academic Language, Collaborative Writing, Cognitive Structures, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Noroozi, Omid; Banihashem, Seyyed Kazem; Biemans, Harm J. A.; Smits, Mattijs; Vervoort, Mariëtte T. W.; Verbaan, Caro-Lynn – Education and Information Technologies, 2023
We know little to what extent peer feedback strategies can be applied on a large scale in higher education for complex tasks. This study aimed to design, implement, and evaluate an online-supported peer feedback module for large-scale use to enhance higher education students' argumentative essay writing performance. To do this, 330 students from…
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Curriculum Implementation, Curriculum Evaluation, Electronic Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chunping Zheng; Xu Chen; Huayang Zhang; Ching Sing Chai – Language Learning & Technology, 2024
This quasi-experimental research investigates the employment of a formative assessment platform aided by artificial intelligence in an English public speaking course. The platform integrates deep learning, automatic speech recognition, and automatic writing evaluation. It provides automated assessment and immediate feedback on speakers' public…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Comparative Analysis, Feedback (Response), Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thuy Thi-Nhu Ngo; Howard Hao-Jan Chen; Kyle Kuo-Wei Lai – Interactive Learning Environments, 2024
The present study performs a three-level meta-analysis to investigate the overall effectiveness of automated writing evaluation (AWE) on EFL/ESL student writing performance. 24 primary studies representing 85 between-group effect sizes and 34 studies representing 178 within-group effect sizes found from 1993 to 2021 were separately meta-analyzed.…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Automation, Computer Software, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Glauco De Vita; Jason Begley – Studies in Higher Education, 2024
Debate about the defining features of 'doctorateness' or what examiners look for in a PhD thesis is on-going, but hardly any attention has been paid in related literature to Postgraduate Researchers' (PGRs) perceptions of the key attributes that make a PhD thesis excellent. In this study we examine the state of play of the former to then go on to…
Descriptors: Doctoral Students, Doctoral Dissertations, Student Research, Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Maira Klyshbekova; Pamela Abbott – Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2024
There is a current debate about the extent to which ChatGPT, a natural language AI chatbot, can disrupt processes in higher education settings. The chatbot is capable of not only answering queries in a human-like way within seconds but can also provide long tracts of texts which can be in the form of essays, emails, and coding. In this study, in…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Higher Education, Technology Uses in Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Liang Liao – Teaching in Higher Education, 2024
This study explores how assessment criteria are applied in grading student work. It is found that explicit assessment criteria do not work as authoritative guidance as expected and that tacit criteria are more decisive in awarding a certain grade. Various sources that form idiosyncratic tacit criteria are identified. These sources, including…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Grading, Criterion Referenced Tests, Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Benjamin Motz; Harmony Jankowski; Jennifer Lopatin; Waverly Tseng; Tamara Tate – Grantee Submission, 2024
Platform-enabled research services will control, manage, and measure learner experiences within that platform. In this paper, we consider the need for research services that examine learner experiences "outside" the platform. For example, we describe an effort to conduct an experiment on peer assessment in a college writing course, where…
Descriptors: Educational Technology, Learning Management Systems, Electronic Learning, Peer Evaluation
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  79