Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Individual Testing | 3 |
Test Items | 3 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Adaptive Testing | 1 |
Behavior Problems | 1 |
Cheating | 1 |
Chemistry | 1 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
College Science | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Holme, Thomas A. | 1 |
Linas Mitchell | 1 |
Meijer, Rob R. | 1 |
Murphy, Kristen L. | 1 |
R. Scott Tindale | 1 |
Rayne Bozeman | 1 |
Robyn K. Mallett | 1 |
Schroeder, Jacob | 1 |
Tendeiro, Jorge N. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rayne Bozeman; Robyn K. Mallett; Linas Mitchell; R. Scott Tindale – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2024
Two-phase testing assesses individual performance (phase 1) and then allows collaborative learning within small groups (phase 2). While groups typically outperform individuals, less is known about the social decision schemes that influence member collaboration. In a classroom setting, we compared individual and group performance on a standard test…
Descriptors: Testing, Group Testing, Cooperative Learning, Learning Experience
Schroeder, Jacob; Murphy, Kristen L.; Holme, Thomas A. – Journal of Chemical Education, 2012
General chemistry tests from the Examinations Institute of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society have been analyzed to identify factors that may influence how individual test items perform. In this paper, issues of item order (position within a set of items that comprise a test) and answer order (position of correct…
Descriptors: Chemistry, Test Items, Individual Testing, Test Construction
Tendeiro, Jorge N.; Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
This article extends the work by Armstrong and Shi on CUmulative SUM (CUSUM) person-fit methodology. The authors present new theoretical considerations concerning the use of CUSUM person-fit statistics based on likelihood ratios for the purpose of detecting cheating and random guessing by individual test takers. According to the Neyman-Pearson…
Descriptors: Cheating, Individual Testing, Adaptive Testing, Statistics