Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Bias | 3 |
Reader Response | 3 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Academic Discourse | 1 |
Action Research | 1 |
Art Education | 1 |
Athletics | 1 |
Childrens Literature | 1 |
College Faculty | 1 |
Criticism | 1 |
Culturally Relevant Education | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Hough, Leaetta | 1 |
Kim, Brian H. | 1 |
Maria Prozesky | 1 |
McCoy, Leah P., Ed. | 1 |
McGrath, Robert E. | 1 |
Naomi Nkealah | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Collected Works - Proceedings | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 2 | 1 |
Primary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
California | 1 |
South Africa | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Naomi Nkealah; Maria Prozesky – Reading Research Quarterly, 2025
As university teachers of literature, we tend to accept the rhetoric that students lack the capacity to interpret texts meaningfully, without questioning our own biases about the kinds of meaning we expect them to elicit from texts. Often, these are meanings that have little relevance to students' own social or professional lives. In this article,…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Literary Criticism, Literature Appreciation, Reader Response
McCoy, Leah P., Ed. – Online Submission, 2021
This document presents the proceedings of the 25th Annual Research Forum held June 30, 2021, at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Included are the following eighteen action research papers: (1) Using Modern Events to Teach United States History (Charles Ahern); (2) "We Are All ESL Teachers": Culturally and…
Descriptors: Action Research, United States History, History Instruction, Current Events
McGrath, Robert E.; Kim, Brian H.; Hough, Leaetta – Psychological Bulletin, 2011
In their comment, M. L. Rohling et al. (2011) accused us of offering a "misleading" review of response bias. In fact, the additional findings they provided on this topic are relevant only to bias assessment in 1 of the domains we discussed, neuropsychological assessment. Furthermore, we contend that, even in that 1 domain, the additional findings…
Descriptors: Response Style (Tests), Bias, Test Validity, Research Methodology