Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 5 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 7 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 13 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 13 |
Descriptor
Researchers | 12 |
Foreign Countries | 9 |
College Faculty | 6 |
Peer Evaluation | 4 |
Scientific Research | 4 |
Universities | 4 |
Bibliometrics | 3 |
Decision Making | 3 |
Productivity | 3 |
Academic Rank (Professional) | 2 |
Case Studies | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Research Evaluation | 13 |
Author
Alesia A. Zuccala | 1 |
Amaral, Livio | 1 |
Arasu, Prema | 1 |
Bautista-Puig, Núria | 1 |
Benson, John | 1 |
Brown, Michelle | 1 |
Carrion, Carme | 1 |
Corina Balaban | 1 |
Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio | 1 |
Doyle, Jamie Mihoko | 1 |
Emilie K. Waern | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 13 |
Reports - Research | 12 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 13 |
Postsecondary Education | 10 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Feenstra, Ramón A.; Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio – Research Evaluation, 2023
The use of bibliometric indicators in research evaluation has a series of complex impacts on academic inquiry. These systems have gradually spread into a wide range of locations and disciplines, including the humanities. The aim of this study is to examine their effects as perceived by philosophy and ethics researchers in Spain, a country where…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Bibliometrics, Philosophy, Ethics
Marta Natalia Wróblewska; Corina Balaban; Gemma Derrick; Paul Benneworth – Research Evaluation, 2024
It has been argued that due to the growing importance attributed to research impact and forms of its evaluation, an academic 'culture of impact' is emerging. It would include certain concepts, values, and skills related to the area of generating and documenting impact. We use thematic and discourse analysis to analyse open answers from 100…
Descriptors: Scientific Research, Researchers, Humanities, Social Sciences
Alesia A. Zuccala; Maria S. Jensen; Emilie K. Waern; Morten Hertzum – Research Evaluation, 2024
Many studies concerning social capital in academia have used social network theory and social network analysis as an approach. Social network analysis focuses on a boundary set of actors in a network and what it reveals as an outcome of social capital. However, social capital is also a precursor or catalyst for cooperative work. Here, we…
Descriptors: Social Capital, College Faculty, Teacher Surveys, Teacher Collaboration
Enxi Jin; Xiaohua Jiang – Research Evaluation, 2024
In response to the escalating reliance on bibliometrics for research evaluation within Chinese universities, this study delves into the far-reaching impact of this trend. Through comprehensive interviews with 15 academics from research-intensive universities encompassing diverse demographics, including gender, age, academic rank, and knowledge…
Descriptors: Bibliometrics, Scientific Research, Universities, College Faculty
Sarah K. Coombs; Peter Meister-Broekema; Ingeborg Meijer – Research Evaluation, 2025
Research conducted by Universities of Applied Sciences (UASs) is frequently driven by professional practice where researchers are challenged with finding solutions to real-life problems. These real-life solutions are significantly enhanced by the participation of stakeholders. Through this inclusion and the resulting interactions, activities, and…
Descriptors: Universities, Technology, Concept Mapping, Research Utilization
Bautista-Puig, Núria; Moreno Lorente, Luis; Sanz-Casado, Elías – Research Evaluation, 2021
The effects of economic incentives on research have been widely debated in the literature. Some authors deem them to have no or even an adverse impact, particularly, if they are perceived as irrelevant to or an attempt to control researcher activity, whilst others believe they enhance research productivity by inducing new habits such as…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Universities, Educational Policy, Educational Research
João M. Santos – Research Evaluation, 2024
The allocation of scientific funding through grant programs is crucial for research advancement. While independent peer panels typically handle evaluations, their decisions can lean on personal preferences that go beyond the stated criteria, leading to inconsistencies and potential biases. Given these concerns, our study employs a novel method,…
Descriptors: Grants, Program Proposals, Funding Formulas, Scientific Research
de Oliveira, Talita Moreira; Amaral, Livio; Pacheco, Roberto Carlos dos Santos – Research Evaluation, 2019
There is a growing interest in multi/inter/transdisciplinary (MIT-D) work, which requires increasing levels of knowledge and co-production interaction. Many studies have addressed this theme with different approaches such as the nature of transversal scientific subjects, the concept of knowledge integration, and the dynamics of research groups to…
Descriptors: Models, Evaluation, Graduate Study, Foreign Countries
Payumo, Jane G.; Lan, George; Arasu, Prema – Research Evaluation, 2018
This study offers a unique lens on the patterns, productivity, and impact of researcher mobility at a US research-intensive university. Bibliometric data for Washington State University (WSU) was extracted from Elsevier's Scopus database and analyzed for the 10-year period from 2002 to 2012. We grouped researchers into four categories based on…
Descriptors: Research Universities, Occupational Mobility, Researchers, Productivity
Glennie, Miriam; O'Donnell, Michael; Brown, Michelle; Benson, John – Research Evaluation, 2019
Evaluators play a central role in assessments of researchers' performance for reward, but the nature of their role and influence is not well understood. Ongoing reliance on evaluator judgement is typically justified as a need for referees in contests for reward, because quantitative performance measures alone can be subject to distortion. Yet, if…
Descriptors: Research Universities, Role, Evaluators, Focus Groups
Walsh, Rachael; Moore, Robert F.; Doyle, Jamie Mihoko – Research Evaluation, 2018
To assist new scientists in the transition to independent research careers, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) implemented an Early Stage Investigator (ESI) policy beginning with applications submitted in 2009. During the review process, the ESI designation segregates applications submitted by investigators who are within 10 years of…
Descriptors: Researchers, Public Policy, Financial Support, Scientists
Mejlgaard, Niels; Ryan, Thomas Kjeldager – Research Evaluation, 2017
In the context of growing societal demand and interdependency, universities need to prioritize their "third mission" activities and balance them against core functions. Individual researchers too are faced with multiple external constituencies and various mechanisms for interaction. The degree, target, and mode of their involvement with…
Descriptors: Scientists, Engineering, Researchers, College Faculty
Solans-Domènech, Maite; Guillamón, Imma; Ribera, Aida; Ferreira-González, Ignacio; Carrion, Carme; Permanyer-Miralda, Gaietà; Pons, Joan M. V. – Research Evaluation, 2017
To blind or not researcher's identity has often been a topic of debate in the context of peer-review process for scientific publication and research grant application. This article reports on how knowing the name and experience of researchers/institutions influences the qualification of a proposal. We present our experience of managing the…
Descriptors: Biomedicine, Medical Research, Grantsmanship, Grants