Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
Source
PRIMUS | 10 |
Author
Gordon, Sheldon P. | 2 |
Zullo, Holly | 2 |
Andrew, Lane | 1 |
Cline, Kelly | 1 |
Cline, Kelly S. | 1 |
Durst, Susan | 1 |
Gerhardt, Ira | 1 |
Huckaby, David A. | 1 |
Kaschner, Scott R. | 1 |
Lewis, Heather A. | 1 |
Parker, Mark | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 10 |
Reports - Descriptive | 6 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 10 |
Postsecondary Education | 6 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Cline, Kelly S.; Huckaby, David A.; Zullo, Holly – PRIMUS, 2023
Using clickers in the statistics classroom can help students identify and understand common errors and misconceptions through a combination of surprise and discussion. Students are presented with multiple-choice questions that they discuss with each other and then vote on; a class-wide discussion follows. Questions for which many students vote for…
Descriptors: Mathematics Instruction, Error Patterns, Misconceptions, Statistics Education
Durst, Susan; Kaschner, Scott R. – PRIMUS, 2020
We explore student performance on True-False assessments with statements in the conditional form "If P then Q" in order to better understand how students process conditional logic and to see whether logical misconceptions impede students' ability to demonstrate mathematical knowledge. We administered an online assessment to a population…
Descriptors: College Mathematics, Mathematics Instruction, Undergraduate Study, Misconceptions
Strickland, S.; Rand, B. – PRIMUS, 2016
This paper describes a framework for identifying, classifying, and coding student proofs, modified from existing proof-grading rubrics. The framework includes 20 common errors, as well as categories for interpreting the severity of the error. The coding scheme is intended for use in a classroom context, for providing effective student feedback. In…
Descriptors: Guidelines, Undergraduate Students, Classification, Mathematics Instruction
Lewis, Heather A. – PRIMUS, 2015
Teachers often promote care in doing calculations, but for most students a single mistake rarely has major consequences. This article presents several real-life events in which relatively minor mathematical errors led to situations that ranged from public embarrassment to the loss of millions of dollars' worth of equipment. The stories here…
Descriptors: Mathematics Instruction, Error Patterns, College Mathematics, Undergraduate Study
Gordon, Sheldon P. – PRIMUS, 2012
Data analysis methods, both numerical and visual, are used to discover a variety of surprising patterns in the errors associated with successive approximations to the derivatives of sinusoidal and exponential functions based on the Newton difference-quotient. L'Hopital's rule and Taylor polynomial approximations are then used to explain why these…
Descriptors: Mathematics Instruction, Mathematical Concepts, Error Patterns, Data Analysis
Gerhardt, Ira – PRIMUS, 2015
An experiment was conducted over three recent semesters of an introductory calculus course to test whether it was possible to quantify the effect that difficulty with basic algebraic and arithmetic computation had on individual performance. Points lost during the term were classified as being due to either algebraic and arithmetic mistakes…
Descriptors: Mathematics Instruction, College Mathematics, Undergraduate Study, Calculus
Shipman, Barbara A.; Shipman, Patrick D. – PRIMUS, 2013
We study situations in introductory analysis in which students affirmed false statements as true, despite simple counterexamples that they easily recognized afterwards. The study draws attention to how simple counterexamples can become hidden in plain sight, even in an active learning atmosphere where students proposed simple (as well as more…
Descriptors: College Mathematics, Undergraduate Study, Mathematics Instruction, Misconceptions
Cline, Kelly; Parker, Mark; Zullo, Holly; Stewart, Ann – PRIMUS, 2012
One technique for identifying and addressing common student errors is the method of classroom voting, in which the instructor presents a multiple-choice question to the class, and after a few minutes for consideration and small group discussion, each student votes on the correct answer, often using a hand-held electronic clicker. If a large number…
Descriptors: Voting, Group Discussion, Calculus, Mathematics Instruction
Andrew, Lane – PRIMUS, 2009
The fact that students have difficulties in constructing proofs is well documented. However, some of these difficulties may be lessened if instructors and students have access to a common evaluation framework. Operating in the theoretical tradition of heuristic inquiry, a proof error evaluation tool (PEET) is constructed that may be used by…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Evaluation Methods, Validity, Mathematical Logic
Gordon, Sheldon P. – PRIMUS, 2005
The possibility of approximating a function with a linear combination of exponential functions of the form e[superscript x], e[superscript 2x], ... is considered as a parallel development to the notion of Taylor polynomials which approximate a function with a linear combination of power function terms. The sinusoidal functions sin "x" and cos "x"…
Descriptors: Mathematics, Theories, Mathematics Education, Calculus