Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Gender Bias | 1 |
| Gender Differences | 1 |
| Generalizability Theory | 1 |
| Grants | 1 |
| Heterogeneous Grouping | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Meta Analysis | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Bornmann, Lutz | 1 |
| Daniel, Hans-Dieter | 1 |
| Marsh, Herbert W. | 1 |
| Mutz, Rudiger | 1 |
| O'Mara, Alison | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMarsh, Herbert W.; Bornmann, Lutz; Mutz, Rudiger; Daniel, Hans-Dieter; O'Mara, Alison – Review of Educational Research, 2009
Peer review is valued in higher education, but also widely criticized in terms of potential biases, particularly gender. We evaluate gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications, extending Bornmann, Mutz, and Daniel's meta-analyses that reported small gender differences in favor of men (d = 0.04), but a substantial heterogeneity in…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Gender Differences, Grants, Peer Evaluation
