Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 4 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Artificial Intelligence | 4 |
Cheating | 3 |
Higher Education | 3 |
Integrity | 3 |
Technology Uses in Education | 3 |
Computer Software | 2 |
Ethics | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Technology Integration | 2 |
Content Analysis | 1 |
Critical Thinking | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Australasian Journal of… | 1 |
Higher Education Policy | 1 |
International Journal of… | 1 |
Journal of Academic Ethics | 1 |
Author
Jasper Roe | 4 |
Mike Perkins | 4 |
Darius Postma | 2 |
Don Hickerson | 2 |
James McGaughran | 2 |
Binh H. Vu | 1 |
Huy Q. Khuat | 1 |
Jason MacVaugh | 1 |
Leon Furze | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 4 |
Postsecondary Education | 4 |
Audience
Location
Vietnam | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mike Perkins; Jasper Roe; Darius Postma; James McGaughran; Don Hickerson – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
This study explores the capability of academic staff assisted by the Turnitin Artificial Intelligence (AI) detection tool to identify the use of AI-generated content in university assessments. 22 different experimental submissions were produced using Open AI's ChatGPT tool, with prompting techniques used to reduce the likelihood of AI detectors…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Student Evaluation, Identification, Natural Language Processing
Mike Perkins; Jasper Roe; Binh H. Vu; Darius Postma; Don Hickerson; James McGaughran; Huy Q. Khuat – International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2024
This study investigates the efficacy of six major Generative AI (GenAI) text detectors when confronted with machine-generated content modified to evade detection (n = 805). We compare these detectors to assess their reliability in identifying AI-generated text in educational settings, where they are increasingly used to address academic integrity…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Inclusion, Computer Software, Word Processing
Mike Perkins; Jasper Roe – Higher Education Policy, 2024
This study presents a corpus analysis of academic integrity policies from Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) worldwide, exploring how they address the issues posed by technological threats, such as Automated Paraphrasing Tools and generative-artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT. The analysis of 142 policies conducted in November and…
Descriptors: Educational Policy, Decoding (Reading), Integrity, Artificial Intelligence
Leon Furze; Mike Perkins; Jasper Roe; Jason MacVaugh – Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2024
The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies in higher education has raised concerns about academic integrity, assessment practices and student learning. Banning or blocking GenAI tools has proven ineffective, and punitive approaches ignore the potential benefits of these technologies. As a result, assessment…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Higher Education, Evaluation Methods