NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 31 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marina Martins – Science & Education, 2024
Few empirical studies in Science Education have investigated the contributions of integrating scientific practices such as argumentation and modelling. In this article, I examine the characteristics of high school students' argumentative dialogues in different modelling situations. From this, I discuss the influences of modelling and the nature of…
Descriptors: High School Students, Persuasive Discourse, Discourse Analysis, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Anisa; Widodo, Ari; Riandi; Muslim – Science & Education, 2023
The purpose of this study is to develop a framework for analyzing classroom argumentation that includes a process of rebutting. A most commonly used framework to analyze argument in science education is Toulmin's Argumentation Pattern. It is useful for analyzing argumentation but it cannot represent the complexity of students' rebuttals during…
Descriptors: High School Students, Grade 12, Science Education, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Agung W. Subiantoro; David Treagust; Kok-Sing Tang – Journal of Biological Education, 2024
This research aimed to understand the features of the informal reasoning skills performed by students who debated the socio-scientific contentious issue of breastfeeding versus milk formula during an Indonesian biology lesson. A class of 30 students in grade 11 discussed this issue by participating in a role play represented by four organisations…
Descriptors: Science and Society, Nutrition, Infants, Biology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tore van der Leij; Martin Goedhart; Lucy Avraamidou; Arjen Wals – Journal of Moral Education, 2024
In this qualitative case study we examined the impact of a specially-designed classroom intervention for a group of 15-16-year-old Dutch biology students' use of values in contemplating five socioscientific issues in the human-nature context. The students worked in small groups to support various aspects of their morality. An ethical matrix was…
Descriptors: High School Students, Biology, Moral Values, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Khishfe, Rola – International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2023
The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between high school students' understandings of aspects about nature of science (NOS) and their argumentation skills, particularly whether informed conceptions of NOS contribute to better argumentation skills. Participants, a total of 125 Grade 10 students, responded to an open-ended…
Descriptors: Scientific Principles, Persuasive Discourse, Scientific Literacy, High School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ackermann, Nicole; Kavadarli, Bengü – Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 2022
Civic argumentation refers to societal problems that may affect various scientific disciplines. Societal problems are complex and their possible solutions controversial. Making informed and reasoned decisions on these problems requires domain-specific content knowledge and domain-specific argumentation skills. This study addresses argumentation on…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Civics, Persuasive Discourse, Social Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lin, Yu-Ren – International Journal of Science Education, 2022
This study examined how students' position on social-scientific issues (SSIs) influenced their performance on attitude toward science, science conceptual and argumentation learning. It defined two positions adopted by students regarding SSIs: affirmative and oppositional. The interactions between student position and two learning environments --…
Descriptors: High School Students, Grade 11, Persuasive Discourse, Influences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sergio Calavia; B. Bravo-Torija; B. Mazas – Journal of Biological Education, 2024
This paper presents an analysis of the socio-scientific dimensions which 46 11th graders, enrolled in the subject scientific culture, consider to justify their COVID-19 vaccination decision and how they managed to combine and integrate these dimensions before and after working on a sequence of activities aimed at learning about argumentation in…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, COVID-19, Pandemics, High School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Garrecht, Carola; Reiss, Michael J.; Harms, Ute – International Journal of Science Education, 2021
Students' argumentation skills are considered a central tool to contribute to scientific controversies in the science classroom. Scientific controversies of social relevance (socioscientific issues; SSI) are subject to multiple viewpoints that are often rooted in diverse disciplines. However, the relationship between issue familiarity and…
Descriptors: Science and Society, Persuasive Discourse, Familiarity, Controversial Issues (Course Content)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhu, Yucheng; He, Aiwen – Journal of Educational Research, 2022
This study investigates the effect of group collaborative argumentation on the quality of decision-making on waste incineration of socioscientific issues (SSI). To achieve this, fifty-nine high school students engaged with a lecture-style class that did not use any argumentation activities. They then completed an individual survey aimed at…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Social Problems, Decision Making, Sanitation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lundegård, Iann; Arvanitis, Leena; Hamza, Karim; Schenk, Linda; Wojcik, Andrzej; Haglund, Karin – Environmental Education Research, 2022
In the current debate, there is no consensus on the relationship between knowledge and values in students' reasoning and argumentation in socio-scientific and sustainability issues, i.e. if these should be addressed as separate entities or rather treated as a whole. In this study, we address this question empirically, with students engaging in two…
Descriptors: Correlation, Risk, Student Attitudes, Genetics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Songsil, Wilaiwan; Pongsophon, Pongprapan; Boonsoong, Boonsatien; Clarke, Anthony – Asia-Pacific Science Education, 2019
Scientific argumentation skills are important for students for expressing their opinions, making decisions and solving problems in daily life. Previous studies have focused on students' scientific argumentation skills, but few studies have proposed an instructional model for specifically developing these skills by creating a supportive classroom…
Descriptors: Science Instruction, Foreign Countries, Grade 10, Inquiry
Alindra, Afridha Laily; Widodo, Ari; Rahman, Taufik; Riandi – Online Submission, 2020
Students will achieve the expected science education outcomes by giving more chances for scientific argumentation through building an argument, considering it, and debating various explanations on the phenomena. The learning activity is a complex and fast process, therefore the use of video can be a solution since the learning process can be…
Descriptors: Learning Activities, Persuasive Discourse, Science Instruction, High School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Pimvichai, Jirutthitikan; Yuenyong, Chokchai; Buaraphan, Khajornsak – Journal of Technology and Science Education, 2019
This study aims to examine the effect of Science-Technology-Society (STS) learning unit on the Work and Energy topic in developing grade 10 students' scientific argumentation. The research participants were 20 grade 10 students at one secondary school located in Khon Kaen province, the Northeastern region of Thailand. The students' tasks,…
Descriptors: Grade 10, Persuasive Discourse, Science and Society, Secondary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Martins, Marina; Justi, Rosária – International Journal of Science Education, 2019
The aims of this paper are twofold. First, we present, justify, and characterise an instrument for analysing students' argumentative reasoning developed from Walton's ideas. Then, from the analysis of students' argumentative discussion about a socio-scientific controversy, we identify the advantages and disadvantages of using the instrument. The…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Abstract Reasoning, Debate, Science and Society
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3