Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| Expertise | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Grammar | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| Holistic Approach | 1 |
| Intelligent Tutoring Systems | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| Writing Evaluation | 1 |
| Writing Instruction | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Grantee Submission | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Arizona (Phoenix) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textAllen, Laura; Crossley, Scott; Kyle, Kris; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2014
The current study examined relationships between expert human judgments of text quality and grammar and mechanical errors in student writing. A corpus of essays (N = 100) written by high school students in the W-Pal system was collected, coded for grammar and mechanical errors, and scored by expert human raters. Results revealed weak relations…
Descriptors: Grammar, Writing Evaluation, Writing Instruction, Essays
