Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
| Grade 4 | 6 |
| Grade 8 | 6 |
| Mathematics Achievement | 6 |
| Reading Achievement | 6 |
| Academic Achievement | 4 |
| Educational Improvement | 4 |
| Federal Legislation | 4 |
| Grade 3 | 4 |
| Grade 5 | 4 |
| Grade 6 | 4 |
| Grade 7 | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 4 | 6 |
| Grade 8 | 6 |
| High Schools | 6 |
| Elementary Education | 4 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 4 |
| Grade 10 | 4 |
| Grade 3 | 4 |
| Grade 5 | 4 |
| Grade 6 | 4 |
| Grade 7 | 4 |
| Secondary Education | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
Location
| Arizona | 6 |
| Arkansas | 1 |
| Colorado | 1 |
| Florida | 1 |
| Kansas | 1 |
| Kentucky | 1 |
| Louisiana | 1 |
| Massachusetts | 1 |
| North Carolina | 1 |
| West Virginia | 1 |
| Wisconsin | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Florida Comprehensive… | 1 |
| Massachusetts Comprehensive… | 1 |
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
| Wisconsin Knowledge and… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHedges, Larry V.; Hedberg, E. C. – Evaluation Review, 2013
Background: Cluster-randomized experiments that assign intact groups such as schools or school districts to treatment conditions are increasingly common in educational research. Such experiments are inherently multilevel designs whose sensitivity (statistical power and precision of estimates) depends on the variance decomposition across levels.…
Descriptors: Correlation, Multivariate Analysis, Educational Experiments, Statistical Analysis
Download full textLazarev, Valeriy; Newman, Denis; Sharp, Alyssa – Regional Educational Laboratory West, 2014
This study explored the relationships among the components of the Arizona Department of Education's new teacher evaluation model, with a particular focus on the extent to which ratings from the state model's teacher observation instrument differentiated higher and lower performance. The study used teacher-level evaluation data collected by the…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Observation, State Departments of Education, Correlation
Center on Education Policy, 2011
This paper profiles Arizona's test score trends through 2008-09. In 2005, the mean scale score on the state 4th grade reading test was 478 for non-Title I students and 445 for Title I students. In 2008, the mean scale score in 4th grade reading was 477 for non-title I students and 450 for title I students. Between 2005 and 2008, the mean scale…
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Academic Achievement, Achievement Gap, Achievement Rating
Arizona Department of Education, 2010
As part of compliance with with the federal No Child Left Behind Act, this document presents the State Report Card of Arizona for 2009-2010. The report card provides tables relating to percentage of students who passed AIMS in Arizona by subject and grade. The tables shown in this document include: (1) Mathematics Grade 3; (2) Reading Grade 3; (3)…
Descriptors: Graduation Rate, Definitions, Educational Improvement, Federal Programs
Arizona Department of Education, 2009
The tables presented in this document show the Arizona Instrument to Measure Standards (AIMS) results for the past two years. Twenty-four tables show results as percent at each performance level and percent passing, as well as percent of students tested. The tables shown in this document include: (1) Mathematics Grade 3; (2) Reading Grade 3; (3)…
Descriptors: Report Cards, Grade 8, Grade 7, Grade 6
Center on Education Policy, 2009
This year the Center on Education Policy (CEP) analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Low Income, American Indians, African American Students
