NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Daniel R. Pimentel – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2025
Students frequently turn to the internet for information about a range of scientific issues. However, they can find it challenging to evaluate the credibility of the information they find, which may increase their susceptibility to mis- and disinformation. This exploratory study reports findings from an instructional intervention designed to teach…
Descriptors: Information Sources, Evaluative Thinking, Internet, Science Process Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peter Kelly; James Goring; Meave Noonan; Seth Brown – British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2024
In this paper -- where we will draw on data from a small scale longitudinal study of young people's post-COVID aspirations and sense of their futures in a de-industrialising city -- we will suggest that Appadurai's (2004) ideas about the 'capacity to aspire' encourages us to shift our focus from the 'aspirations' of individual young people to…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, High School Students, Grade 11, COVID-19
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nathan Mentzer; Wonki Lee; Andrew Jackson; Scott Bartholomew – International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2024
Adaptive comparative judgment (ACJ) has been widely used to evaluate classroom artifacts with reliability and validity. In the ACJ experience we examined, students were provided a pair of images related to backpack design. For each pair, students were required to select which image could help them ideate better. Then, they were prompted to provide…
Descriptors: Evaluative Thinking, Design, Engineering Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Wonki Lee; Nathan Mentzer; Andrew Jackson; Scott Bartholomew; Amiah Clevenger – Design and Technology Education, 2024
This research investigates students' argumentation quality in engineering design thinking. We implemented Learning by Evaluating (LbE) using Adaptive Comparative Judgment (ACJ), where students assess pairs of items to determine the superior one. In ACJ, students provided rationales for their critiques, explaining their selections. Fifteen students…
Descriptors: Engineering Education, Persuasive Discourse, Design, Thinking Skills