Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Disproportionate… | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Focus Groups | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| High Stakes Tests | 1 |
| Labeling (of Persons) | 1 |
| Mathematics Achievement | 1 |
| Mathematics Teachers | 1 |
| Minority Group Students | 1 |
| Observation | 1 |
| Poverty | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Mathematics… | 1 |
Author
| Bolz, Joseph | 1 |
| Kitchen, Richard | 1 |
| Ridder, Sarah Anderson | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Colorado | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKitchen, Richard; Ridder, Sarah Anderson; Bolz, Joseph – Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 2016
Research is needed to understand the impact of high-stakes testing on teachers' practices and consequently on their students, particularly at schools that serve large numbers of low-income students and students of color. In this research study, we examined how a state's annual high-stakes test and administrative mandates influenced the assessment…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Mathematics Teachers, Urban Schools, High Schools
