Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Error Patterns | 3 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
Educational Research | 1 |
Effect Size | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
Expository Writing | 1 |
Governing Boards | 1 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
Grade 2 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Bahr, Ruth Huntley | 1 |
Berninger, Virginia W. | 1 |
Deke, John | 1 |
Dow, Michael | 1 |
Dragoset, Lisa | 1 |
Gross, Paul R. | 1 |
Silliman, Elaine R. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Grade 1 | 3 |
Grade 2 | 3 |
Grade 3 | 3 |
Grade 4 | 3 |
Grade 5 | 3 |
Grade 6 | 3 |
Grade 7 | 3 |
Grade 8 | 3 |
Grade 9 | 3 |
Kindergarten | 2 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Deke, John; Dragoset, Lisa – Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., 2012
The regression discontinuity design (RDD) has the potential to yield findings with causal validity approaching that of the randomized controlled trial (RCT). However, Schochet (2008a) estimated that, on average, an RDD study of an education intervention would need to include three to four times as many schools or students as an RCT to produce…
Descriptors: Research Design, Elementary Secondary Education, Regression (Statistics), Educational Research
Bahr, Ruth Huntley; Silliman, Elaine R.; Berninger, Virginia W.; Dow, Michael – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2012
Purpose: A mixed-methods approach, evaluating triple word-form theory, was used to describe linguistic patterns of misspellings. Method: Spelling errors were taken from narrative and expository writing samples provided by 888 typically developing students in Grades 1-9. Errors were coded by category (phonological, orthographic, and morphological)…
Descriptors: Language Patterns, Spelling, Mixed Methods Research, Expository Writing
Gross, Paul R. – Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute, 2005
The mission of this review is to appraise the new draft NAEP science framework and to determine whether it is up to snuff. This is an evaluation of the September 30, 2005, draft document, Science Framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress (Framework), developed for the National Assessment Governing Board. The criteria is…
Descriptors: Governing Boards, National Competency Tests, Evaluation Criteria, Science Instruction