Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Grade 5 | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Grade 7 | 2 |
Grade 8 | 2 |
Item Response Theory | 2 |
Scaling | 2 |
Achievement Gains | 1 |
Bias | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Grade 8 | 3 |
Elementary Education | 2 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Grade 5 | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Grade 7 | 2 |
Junior High Schools | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 2 | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Colorado | 3 |
Florida | 2 |
North Carolina | 2 |
Arizona | 1 |
Delaware | 1 |
Idaho | 1 |
Illinois | 1 |
Indiana | 1 |
Missouri | 1 |
New Mexico | 1 |
New York | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Murphy, Daniel L.; Beretvas, S. Natasha – Applied Measurement in Education, 2015
This study examines the use of cross-classified random effects models (CCrem) and cross-classified multiple membership random effects models (CCMMrem) to model rater bias and estimate teacher effectiveness. Effect estimates are compared using CTT versus item response theory (IRT) scaling methods and three models (i.e., conventional multilevel…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Comparative Analysis, Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Test Theory
Dadey, Nathan; Briggs, Derek C. – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2012
A vertical scale, in principle, provides a common metric across tests with differing difficulties (e.g., spanning multiple grades) so that statements of "absolute" growth can be made. This paper compares 16 states' 2007-2008 effect size growth trends on vertically scaled reading and math assessments across grades 3 to 8. Two patterns…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Scaling, Effect Size, Reading Tests
Sevier, Brian R. – Educational Foundations, 2009
In this article, the author posits a dual argument. First, he contends that the post-WWII discourse of national unity pushed intolerance to the forefront of the domestic agenda linking its elimination with social cohesion while simultaneously advancing assimilationist and meritocratic beliefs about "the" American experience. Here, he…
Descriptors: Group Unity, Nationalism, Political Attitudes, Social Bias