Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Grade 8 | 2 |
| Middle School Students | 2 |
| Peer Relationship | 2 |
| Reliability | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Aggression | 1 |
| Comparative Education | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Expertise | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| International Journal of… | 2 |
Author
| Babcock, Ben | 2 |
| Cillessen, Antonius H. N. | 2 |
| Marks, Peter E. L. | 2 |
| van den Berg, Yvonne H. M. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 8 | 2 |
| Junior High Schools | 2 |
| Middle Schools | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Netherlands | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMarks, Peter E. L.; Babcock, Ben; van den Berg, Yvonne H. M.; Cillessen, Antonius H. N. – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2019
In peer nomination research, individuals who do not provide nominations (nonparticipants) are often included on rosters as potential nominees. This can present ethical questions regarding informed consent, but psychometric consequences of excluding nonparticipants from rosters are unknown. In this investigation, Study 1 simulated both random and…
Descriptors: Peer Groups, Adolescents, Grade 7, Grade 8
Marks, Peter E. L.; Babcock, Ben; Cillessen, Antonius H. N. – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2015
The current study aims to evaluate and empirically investigate Prinstein's (2007) conclusions regarding "expert nominators," a subsample of individuals in a peer group whose peer nominations might substitute for nominations from the full sample. The current study empirically identified experts based on "comparative accuracy,"…
Descriptors: Expertise, Accuracy, Grade 8, Reliability
