Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 8 |
Descriptor
Reading Achievement | 8 |
Teacher Evaluation | 8 |
Mathematics Achievement | 7 |
Scores | 6 |
Grade 6 | 5 |
Grade 7 | 5 |
Grade 8 | 5 |
Teacher Effectiveness | 5 |
Achievement Gains | 4 |
Correlation | 4 |
Grade 4 | 4 |
More ▼ |
Source
National Center for Education… | 2 |
Annenberg Institute for… | 1 |
Educational and Psychological… | 1 |
National Center on… | 1 |
Phi Delta Kappan | 1 |
Regional Educational… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse | 1 |
Author
Brown, Seth | 2 |
Garet, Michael S. | 2 |
Manzeske, David | 2 |
Rickles, Jordan | 2 |
Song, Mengli | 2 |
Wayne, Andrew J. | 2 |
Allen, Joseph P. | 1 |
Ballou, Dale | 1 |
Cronin, John | 1 |
Hamilton, Laura | 1 |
Jensen, Nate | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 5 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Grade 6 | 8 |
Grade 7 | 8 |
Grade 8 | 8 |
Grade 5 | 7 |
Grade 4 | 6 |
Middle Schools | 6 |
Elementary Education | 5 |
Junior High Schools | 5 |
Secondary Education | 5 |
Intermediate Grades | 4 |
Early Childhood Education | 2 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards | 2 |
Seth B. Hunter; Katherine M. Bowser – Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University, 2024
We extend teacher evaluation research by estimating a reformed evaluation system's plausibly causal average effects on rural student achievement, identifying the settings where evaluation works, and incorporating evaluation expenditures. That the literature omits these contributions is concerning as research implies it hinders evidence-based…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Rural Schools, Teacher Effectiveness, Mathematics Achievement
Cronin, John; Jensen, Nate; Wise, Steve – Phi Delta Kappan, 2016
In 2012, New York education officials and the state's teachers union announced one of the nation's most aggressive programs for teacher and principal evaluation--the Annual Professional Performance Review system (APPR)--which required that 40% of an educator's evaluation be based on student growth, using a combination of the state assessment and…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Teacher Evaluation, Achievement Gains, Data Collection
Garet, Michael S.; Wayne, Andrew J.; Brown, Seth; Rickles, Jordan; Song, Mengli; Manzeske, David – National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2017
Educator performance evaluation systems are a potential tool for improving student achievement by increasing the effectiveness of the educator workforce. For example, recent research suggests that giving more frequent, specific feedback on classroom practice may lead to improvements in teacher performance and student achievement. This report is…
Descriptors: Performance Based Assessment, Feedback (Response), School Districts, Classroom Techniques
Garet, Michael S.; Wayne, Andrew J.; Brown, Seth; Rickles, Jordan; Song, Mengli; Manzeske, David – National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2017
Educator performance evaluation systems are a potential tool for improving student achievement by increasing the effectiveness of the educator workforce. For example, recent research suggests that giving more frequent, specific feedback on classroom practice may lead to improvements in teacher performance and student achievement. This report is…
Descriptors: Performance Based Assessment, Feedback (Response), School Districts, Classroom Techniques
What Works Clearinghouse, 2015
"TAP"™: "The System for Teacher and Student Advancement (TAP™)" is an educator effectiveness program that aims to improve student achievement through supports and incentives for teachers. Based on the research, "TAP"™ teachers were found to have no discernible effects on student achievement in science, English…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Science Achievement, Language Arts, Reading Achievement
Mashburn, Andrew J.; Meyer, J. Patrick; Allen, Joseph P.; Pianta, Robert C. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2014
Observational methods are increasingly being used in classrooms to evaluate the quality of teaching. Operational procedures for observing teachers are somewhat arbitrary in existing measures and vary across different instruments. To study the effect of different observation procedures on score reliability and validity, we conducted an experimental…
Descriptors: Observation, Teacher Evaluation, Reliability, Validity
Lazarev, Valeriy; Newman, Denis; Sharp, Alyssa – Regional Educational Laboratory West, 2014
This study explored the relationships among the components of the Arizona Department of Education's new teacher evaluation model, with a particular focus on the extent to which ratings from the state model's teacher observation instrument differentiated higher and lower performance. The study used teacher-level evaluation data collected by the…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Observation, State Departments of Education, Correlation
Springer, Matthew G.; Hamilton, Laura; McCaffrey, Daniel F.; Ballou, Dale; Le, Vi-Nhuan; Pepper, Matthew; Lockwood, J. R.; Stecher, Brian M. – National Center on Performance Incentives, 2010
In an effort to explore the impact of performance incentives in education, the National Center on Performance Incentives (NCPI) partnered with the Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools (MNPS) to conduct the Project on Incentives in Teaching, or POINT. The study examines the effects on student outcomes of paying eligible teachers bonuses of up to…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Teacher Behavior, Academic Achievement, Program Effectiveness