Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
| Writing Tests | 6 |
| Grade 11 | 4 |
| Grade 7 | 4 |
| Grade 10 | 3 |
| Grade 9 | 3 |
| Reading Tests | 3 |
| Academic Standards | 2 |
| Career Readiness | 2 |
| College Readiness | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Correlation | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| ACT, Inc. | 1 |
| American Institutes for… | 1 |
| Communication Disorders… | 1 |
| Curriculum Journal | 1 |
| ETS Research Report Series | 1 |
| Language Testing | 1 |
Author
| Allen, Jeff | 1 |
| Apel, Kenn | 1 |
| Attali, Yigal | 1 |
| Berge, Kjell Lars | 1 |
| Burstein, Jill | 1 |
| Chang, Jianfang | 1 |
| Evensen, Lars Sigfred | 1 |
| Hall-Mills, Shannon | 1 |
| Hau, Kit Tai | 1 |
| Ho, Man Koon | 1 |
| Leong, Che Kan | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 6 |
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 11 | 6 |
| Grade 7 | 6 |
| Grade 10 | 5 |
| Grade 9 | 5 |
| Secondary Education | 5 |
| Grade 6 | 4 |
| Grade 8 | 4 |
| Elementary Education | 3 |
| Grade 12 | 3 |
| Grade 4 | 3 |
| High Schools | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Graduate Management Admission… | 1 |
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkEvensen, Lars Sigfred; Berge, Kjell Lars; Thygesen, Ragnar; Matre, Synnove; Solheim, Randi – Curriculum Journal, 2016
The Berge et al. article in this volume presents the functional construct of writing that underlies summative and formative assessment of writing as a key competency in Norway. A functional construct implies that specific acts of writing and their purposes constrain what is a relevant selection among the semiotic resources that writing generally…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Academic Standards, Writing Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Hall-Mills, Shannon; Apel, Kenn – Communication Disorders Quarterly, 2013
We evaluated the narrative and expository writing samples of 12 adolescents with language-learning disabilities (LLD) in Grades 6 to 12 for elements of microstructure (e.g., productivity, grammatical complexity) and macrostructure (genre-specific text structure elements) using an experimental measure. Writing samples were elicited with…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Writing Tests, Adolescents, Writing Evaluation
Download full textAllen, Jeff – ACT, Inc., 2014
This report focuses on the initial development of the predicted score paths for ACT Aspire reporting. The paths provide predicted score ranges for the next two years--as well as predicted ACT score ranges for tests administered at grades 9 and 10. Longitudinal ACT Aspire data for students tested in spring 2013 and spring 2014, as well as…
Descriptors: College Readiness, Career Readiness, Achievement Tests, Scores
Leong, Che Kan; Ho, Man Koon; Chang, Jianfang; Hau, Kit Tai – Language Testing, 2013
The present study examined pedagogic components of Chinese reading literacy in a representative sample of 1164 Grades 7, 9 and 11 Chinese students (mean age of 15 years) from 11 secondary schools in Hong Kong with each student tested for about 2.5 hours. Multiple group confirmatory factor analyses showed that across the three grade levels, the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Secondary School Students, Grade 7, Grade 9
Thissen, David; Norton, Scott – American Institutes for Research, 2013
Development of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), and the creation of the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (Smarter Balanced) and the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC), changes the pattern of accountability testing. These changes raise the question: "How should NAEP's validity and utility be…
Descriptors: National Competency Tests, Psychometrics, State Standards, Academic Standards
Attali, Yigal; Burstein, Jill – ETS Research Report Series, 2005
The e-rater® system has been used by ETS for automated essay scoring since 1999. This paper describes a new version of e-rater (v.2.0) that differs from the previous one (v.1.3) with regard to the feature set and model building approach. The paper describes the new version, compares the new and previous versions in terms of performance, and…
Descriptors: Essay Tests, Automation, Scoring, Comparative Analysis
