Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 5 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 13 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 18 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 67 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Chang, Mido | 2 |
| Hong, Jun Sung | 2 |
| An, Sohyun | 1 |
| Atwal, Kavita | 1 |
| Balf, Ruth | 1 |
| Benson, Amy | 1 |
| Bristol, Travis J. | 1 |
| Britton, Tolani A. | 1 |
| Buchanan, Lisa Brown | 1 |
| Caravita, Simona C | 1 |
| Carolyn M. Callahan | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 36 |
| Journal Articles | 26 |
| Reports - Research | 23 |
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 7 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 5 | 69 |
| Elementary Education | 65 |
| Grade 4 | 55 |
| Grade 3 | 51 |
| Middle Schools | 50 |
| Grade 6 | 45 |
| Grade 7 | 42 |
| Grade 8 | 42 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 30 |
| Intermediate Grades | 21 |
| Early Childhood Education | 9 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Texas | 7 |
| California | 5 |
| Illinois | 4 |
| Arizona | 3 |
| Georgia | 3 |
| New York | 3 |
| Colorado | 2 |
| Delaware | 2 |
| Florida | 2 |
| Idaho | 2 |
| Indiana | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 33 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Early Childhood Longitudinal… | 6 |
| Measures of Academic Progress | 2 |
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
| Stanford Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Texas Assessment of Academic… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textThomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Xiang, Yun; McCahon, Donna – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states have leeway to: (1) Craft their own academic standards, select their own tests, and define…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Uyeno, Russell; Zhang, Shuqiang; Chin-Chance, Selvin – Online Submission, 2006
Background: The Hawaii Department of Education (HDOE) launched its Hawaii State Assessment (HSA) in spring, 2002, within the context of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) Act of 2001 and its mandates to close the "achievement gaps" between subgroups of students. Thus, it is important to investigate the extent to which student…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Poverty, Age Differences, Minority Group Children
Peer reviewed
Direct linkDeRosier, Melissa E. – Journal of School Violence, 2004
Since September 11, 2001, ethnic tensions involving persons of Middle Eastern descent have increased in the United States. This study examined the peer relationships of 748 fifth-grade students of different ethnic groups both at one month and eight months post-9-11. Results indicated that only Middle Eastern children showed a large drop in…
Descriptors: Bullying, Ethnic Groups, Peer Relationship, Social Environment
Lorence, Jon; Dworkin, Anthony Gary.; Toenjes, Laurence A.; Hill, Antwanette N. – Brookings Papers on Education Policy, 2002
Although considerable research examines the impact of grade retention on student academic achievement, various shortcomings exhibited across these studies make it difficult to derive any concrete generalizations about the effectiveness of requiring students to repeat a grade. By utilizing data based on a cohort of all low-achieving elementary…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Grade Repetition, Reading Tests, Social Promotion
