NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Richard Correnti; Lindsay Clare Matsumura; Elaine Lin Wang; Diane Litman; Haoran Zhang – Grantee Submission, 2022
Recent reviews of automated writing evaluation systems indicate lack of uniformity in the purpose, design, and assessment of such systems. Our work lies at the nexus of critical themes arising from these reviews. We describe our work on eRevise, an automated writing evaluation system focused on elementary students' text-based evidence-use. eRevise…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Automation, Elementary School Students
Wang, Elaine Lin; Matsumura, Lindsay Clare; Correnti, Richard; Litman, Diane; Zhang, Haoran; Howe, Emily; Magooda, Ahmed; Quintana, Rafael – Grantee Submission, 2020
We investigate students' implementation of the feedback messages they received in an automated writing evaluation system ("eRevise") that aims to improve students' use of text evidence in their writing. Seven 5th and 6th-grade teachers implemented "eRevise" (n = 143 students). Qualitative analysis of students' essays across…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Computer Software, Grade 5
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Al-Hroub, Anies; Shami, Ghina; Evans, Michael – Language Learning Journal, 2019
The aim of the action research reported here was to examine the differential effects of the 'writers' workshop' approach on the L2 (English) writing skills of upper-primary students with varying writing abilities. The participants were 31 fifth-grade students (17 boys and 14 girls) aged 10-11, who followed L2 English writing instruction based on…
Descriptors: Writing Workshops, Process Approach (Writing), Revision (Written Composition), Writing Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moore, Noreen S.; MacArthur, Charles A. – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2012
Opportunities to read and analyze others' writing or to observe readers as they analyze writing might enhance one's own sense of audience and improve one's own writing. This mixed-methods study investigated whether reader and observer activities in comparison to writing practice activities affected fifth-grade students' persuasive writing and…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Audience Awareness, Audiences, Grade 5
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Wilson, Joshua; Olinghouse, Natalie G.; Andrada, Gilbert N. – Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 2014
The current study examines data from students in grades 4-8 who participated in a statewide computer-based benchmark writing assessment that featured automated essay scoring and automated feedback. We examined whether the use of automated feedback was associated with gains in writing quality across revisions to an essay, and with transfer effects…
Descriptors: Writing Skills, Writing Ability, Feedback (Response), Computer Mediated Communication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Crinon, Jacques; Marin, Brigitte – Language Awareness, 2010
French students in grades 4 and 5 in schools around Paris wrote explanatory texts in L1 following a lesson in the Life Sciences, four times over the course of the school year. Each session included written correspondence with another student; half the students (Group G1) made suggestions about ways to improve the drafts of the other half of the…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Biological Sciences, Grade 4, Grade 5