Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
| Arizona Department of… | 2 |
| Thomas B. Fordham Institute | 2 |
| Journal of Education for… | 1 |
| Regional Educational… | 1 |
Author
| Barrat, Vanessa X. | 1 |
| Crane, Eric W. | 1 |
| Cronin, John | 1 |
| Dahlin, Michael | 1 |
| Huang, Min | 1 |
| Hubbard, Lea | 1 |
| McCahon, Donna | 1 |
| Metz-Matthews, Kelly | 1 |
| Resultan, Barbara | 1 |
| Xiang, Yun | 1 |
Publication Type
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 5 | 6 |
| Grade 6 | 6 |
| Grade 7 | 6 |
| Grade 3 | 5 |
| Grade 4 | 5 |
| Grade 8 | 5 |
| Elementary Education | 4 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 4 |
| Middle Schools | 3 |
| Grade 10 | 2 |
| High Schools | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
Location
| Arizona | 6 |
| California | 2 |
| Florida | 2 |
| Washington | 2 |
| California (San Diego) | 1 |
| Colorado | 1 |
| Delaware | 1 |
| Georgia | 1 |
| Idaho | 1 |
| Illinois | 1 |
| Indiana | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 5 |
Assessments and Surveys
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHubbard, Lea; Metz-Matthews, Kelly; Resultan, Barbara – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2022
Educators, researchers, and policy makers concerned about college under-enrollment among underserved groups of students have traditionally focused reform efforts at the high school level. Over the last several decades, however, there has been a growing interest in improving college readiness beginning at the elementary level. Recently, the…
Descriptors: College Readiness, Program Effectiveness, Teacher Attitudes, Administrator Attitudes
Download full textCrane, Eric W.; Barrat, Vanessa X.; Huang, Min – Regional Educational Laboratory West, 2011
This technical brief responds to an Arizona Department of Education request to study academic performance in schools receiving funding through the federal Title I compensatory education program, the section of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 governing resources for schools and districts serving disadvantaged populations. The brief describes…
Descriptors: Disadvantaged Schools, Federal Aid, Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Arizona Department of Education, 2010
As part of compliance with with the federal No Child Left Behind Act, this document presents the State Report Card of Arizona for 2009-2010. The report card provides tables relating to percentage of students who passed AIMS in Arizona by subject and grade. The tables shown in this document include: (1) Mathematics Grade 3; (2) Reading Grade 3; (3)…
Descriptors: Graduation Rate, Definitions, Educational Improvement, Federal Programs
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Xiang, Yun; McCahon, Donna – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states have leeway to: (1) Craft their own academic standards, select their own tests, and define…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Arizona Department of Education, 2009
The tables presented in this document show the Arizona Instrument to Measure Standards (AIMS) results for the past two years. Twenty-four tables show results as percent at each performance level and percent passing, as well as percent of students tested. The tables shown in this document include: (1) Mathematics Grade 3; (2) Reading Grade 3; (3)…
Descriptors: Report Cards, Grade 8, Grade 7, Grade 6
