Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Source
Center on Education Policy | 1 |
Education Policy Research Unit | 1 |
National Center for Education… | 1 |
National Center for the… | 1 |
Regional Educational… | 1 |
Author
Alzen, Jessica | 1 |
Bates, Lauren | 1 |
Berliner, David C. | 1 |
Breslow, Nicole | 1 |
Briggs, Derek C. | 1 |
Chattergoon, Rajendra | 1 |
Diaz-Bilello, Elena | 1 |
Glass, Gene V. | 1 |
Hupert, Naomi | 1 |
Johnson, Raymond | 1 |
Nichols, Sharon L. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Grade 4 | 5 |
Elementary Education | 4 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Grade 8 | 3 |
Early Childhood Education | 2 |
Grade 10 | 2 |
Grade 11 | 2 |
Grade 12 | 2 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Grade 5 | 2 |
High Schools | 2 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Rhode Island | 5 |
Alabama | 2 |
Georgia | 2 |
Hawaii | 2 |
Kentucky | 2 |
New York | 2 |
Arizona | 1 |
Arkansas | 1 |
California | 1 |
Colorado | 1 |
Connecticut | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Briggs, Derek C.; Diaz-Bilello, Elena; Peck, Fred; Alzen, Jessica; Chattergoon, Rajendra; Johnson, Raymond – National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, 2015
This report describes the use of a Learning Progression Framework (LPF) to support the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) process. The report highlights a few common threats we currently see in the SLO process implemented at various states and districts, and offers the LPF as a possible solution for addressing these threats. This report was…
Descriptors: Learning Processes, Educational Objectives, Academic Achievement, Elementary School Students
Center on Education Policy, 2009
This year the Center on Education Policy analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps between…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Low Income, American Indians, African American Students
National Center for Education Statistics, 2011
Guided by a new framework, the NAEP science assessment was updated in 2009 to keep the content current with key developments in science, curriculum standards, assessments, and research. The 2009 framework organizes science content into three broad content areas. Physical science includes concepts related to properties and changes of matter, forms…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Curriculum Development, Comparative Analysis, Elementary School Science
Bates, Lauren; Breslow, Nicole; Hupert, Naomi – Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands, 2009
This report describes efforts by five states (Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, New Jersey, and Rhode Island) to improve adolescent literacy. Highlighting common challenges and lessons, the report examines how each state has engaged key stakeholders, set rigorous goals and standards, aligned resources to support adolescent literacy goals, built…
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, State Departments of Education, Literacy, Adolescents
Nichols, Sharon L.; Glass, Gene V.; Berliner, David C. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), standardized test scores are the indicator used to hold schools and school districts accountable for student achievement. Each state is responsible for constructing an accountability system, attaching consequences--or stakes--for student performance. The theory of action implied by this…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Standardized Tests, Academic Achievement, Federal Legislation