Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
Berliner, David C. | 2 |
Glass, Gene V. | 2 |
Nichols, Sharon L. | 2 |
Cronin, John | 1 |
Dahlin, Michael | 1 |
McCahon, Donna | 1 |
Xiang, Yun | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 5 |
Grade 4 | 5 |
Grade 8 | 5 |
Elementary Education | 3 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Grade 5 | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Grade 7 | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Grade 10 | 1 |
Grade 11 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Maine | 5 |
Arizona | 3 |
Georgia | 3 |
Massachusetts | 3 |
New Mexico | 3 |
Rhode Island | 3 |
South Carolina | 3 |
Texas | 3 |
Wyoming | 3 |
Alabama | 2 |
Arkansas | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 5 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 2 |
Connecticut Mastery Testing… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Xiang, Yun; McCahon, Donna – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states have leeway to: (1) Craft their own academic standards, select their own tests, and define…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Center on Education Policy, 2009
This year the Center on Education Policy (CEP) analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Low Income, American Indians, African American Students
Nichols, Sharon L.; Glass, Gene V.; Berliner, David C. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
This paper presents the appendices to the "High-Stakes Testing and Student Achievement: Problems for the No Child Left Behind Act" report. It contains the following appendices: (1) Example of Context for Assessing State-Level Stakes Sheet--Connecticut; (2) Example of Completed Rewards and Sanctions Worksheet--Connecticut; (3) Directions…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Standardized Tests, Academic Achievement, Federal Legislation
Nichols, Sharon L.; Glass, Gene V.; Berliner, David C. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), standardized test scores are the indicator used to hold schools and school districts accountable for student achievement. Each state is responsible for constructing an accountability system, attaching consequences--or stakes--for student performance. The theory of action implied by this…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Standardized Tests, Academic Achievement, Federal Legislation